Evaluating Benefits of ENERGY STAR Units

Importance of Proper Refrigerant Levels

In today's world, with increasing awareness of environmental sustainability and the need for energy efficiency, ENERGY STAR certification stands as a beacon of reliability and quality. Heating systems should be inspected before the winter season begins hvac mobile home pollutant. Established by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in 1992, this certification aims to help consumers identify products that save energy without compromising on performance. But what exactly is ENERGY STAR certification, and why is it important when evaluating the benefits of ENERGY STAR units?


ENERGY STAR certification is awarded to products that meet strict energy efficiency guidelines set by the EPA. These products include a wide range of items such as appliances, electronics, heating and cooling systems, and even entire buildings. To earn this label, a product must demonstrate significant reductions in energy use compared to standard models. The underlying goal is simple: reduce greenhouse gas emissions while saving consumers money on their energy bills.


One of the primary benefits of owning an ENERGY STAR certified unit is cost savings. Products bearing this label are designed to be more efficient than their non-certified counterparts, which translates into lower utility bills over time. For instance, an ENERGY STAR certified refrigerator uses about 15% less energy than non-certified models. Over the lifespan of an appliance or device, these savings can add up significantly.


Beyond individual savings, ENERGY STAR contributes to broader environmental benefits by reducing demand on power plants and decreasing harmful emissions. With climate change being a pressing global issue, using products that require less electricity helps mitigate its impact by lowering carbon footprints both at home and nationwide.


Moreover, opting for ENERGY STAR certified units supports innovation in technology design and manufacturing processes. Manufacturers are encouraged to develop new methods that enhance efficiency without sacrificing quality or usability. This push towards innovation not only drives economic growth but also leads to advancements that benefit society as a whole.


Another key advantage of choosing ENERGY STAR units is their influence on property value and consumer perception. Homes equipped with certified appliances often have higher market appeal due to their promise of lower operating costs and reduced environmental impact-factors increasingly valued by eco-conscious buyers.


Furthermore, consumers today face an overwhelming array of choices when purchasing household goods or building materials. The ENERGY STAR label serves as a trusted guide amidst this complexity-a straightforward indicator that assures them they are making an environmentally responsible choice without extensive research or technical expertise.


In conclusion, ENERGY STAR certification plays a critical role in promoting energy efficiency across various sectors while delivering tangible benefits to consumers and society at large. By prioritizing products with this certification when evaluating purchase options, individuals contribute towards sustainable living practices that safeguard our environment for future generations while enjoying immediate financial rewards through reduced energy costs. As we continue to seek ways to combat climate change effectively, embracing initiatives like ENERGY STAR remains essential in steering us toward a more sustainable future.

Mobile home living offers a unique blend of affordability and flexibility, but it also comes with specific challenges, especially when it comes to heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems. These homes require specialized HVAC solutions due to their distinct structural characteristics. Understanding the benefits of ENERGY STAR units in this context can significantly enhance both energy efficiency and occupant comfort.


Mobile homes typically have limited space for HVAC systems, which means that every component must be carefully selected for maximum efficiency and effectiveness. Traditional HVAC systems may not fit well within these constraints, often leading to higher energy consumption and less effective climate control. This is where ENERGY STAR-certified units come into play.


ENERGY STAR is a trusted symbol for energy efficiency, helping consumers save money and protect the environment through superior energy performance. For mobile home residents, opting for an ENERGY STAR-rated HVAC system can offer several advantages. First and foremost, these units are designed to consume less electricity compared to non-certified models, which directly translates into lower utility bills-a critical consideration given the rising cost of energy.


In addition to cost savings, ENERGY STAR units are recognized for their ability to maintain consistent indoor temperatures more effectively than standard systems. This means that during sweltering summer months or chilly winter nights, an ENERGY STAR unit can help ensure that your mobile home remains comfortable without overworking itself or causing undue wear and tear on the system.


Moreover, these certified units are subject to rigorous testing standards that guarantee better durability and reliability over time. For homeowners who want peace of mind knowing their investment will last longer without frequent breakdowns or repairs, choosing an ENERGY STAR unit is a smart decision.


Another significant benefit lies in the environmental impact-or rather-the minimized environmental impact of these systems. By consuming less energy, they contribute less carbon dioxide emissions into the atmosphere compared to traditional HVAC systems. This makes them an excellent choice for environmentally conscious homeowners looking to reduce their carbon footprint while maintaining a comfortable living space.


It's also worth noting that many utility companies offer rebates or incentives for upgrading to ENERGY STAR-certified appliances-including HVAC systems-which can further offset initial purchase costs.


In conclusion, evaluating the benefits of ENERGY STAR units specifically tailored for mobile homes reveals numerous advantages ranging from financial savings and enhanced comfort levels to increased longevity and reduced environmental impact. For those residing in mobile homes seeking efficient climate control solutions without compromising on sustainability or budget considerations-an ENERGY STAR-certified HVAC system stands out as a compelling choice worth serious consideration.

More About Us

What Yelp Says About Us

How to reach us


Optimizing HVAC Performance with Energy Saving Technologies

The evolution of HVAC (Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning) technology has been akin to a silent revolution.. It is quietly reshaping how we heat, cool, and ventilate our homes and workplaces while addressing the pressing need for energy efficiency.

Posted by on 2024-12-27

Sealing Duct Leaks for Improved Efficiency in Mobile Homes

Mobile homes offer a unique blend of affordability and mobility, making them an appealing choice for many.. However, like any dwelling, they require regular maintenance to ensure optimal living conditions.

Posted by on 2024-12-27

Signs and Symptoms of Low Refrigerant

Energy efficiency has become a cornerstone of sustainable living, and one of the leading symbols in this movement is the ENERGY STAR label. Evaluating the benefits of ENERGY STAR units requires an understanding of how these products contribute not only to individual households but also to broader environmental goals.


Firstly, ENERGY STAR units are designed to consume less energy while maintaining or exceeding performance standards compared to their non-certified counterparts. This directly translates into financial savings for consumers. By reducing energy consumption, utility bills are significantly lowered, providing substantial cost savings over the lifespan of these appliances. For many households, these savings can be reinvested into other areas such as home improvements or supporting family needs.


Beyond immediate financial incentives, ENERGY STAR units play a crucial role in environmental conservation. Reducing energy consumption means fewer fossil fuels burned for electricity generation, which leads to a decrease in greenhouse gas emissions. In this way, each ENERGY STAR unit contributes to mitigating climate change and promoting cleaner air quality. Given the increasing global awareness of environmental issues, purchasing decisions that favor such efficient appliances align with personal and collective responsibility towards our planet.


Moreover, using ENERGY STAR certified products supports innovation and technological advancement within industries. Manufacturers are encouraged to develop more efficient technologies and designs to meet or exceed certification criteria. This drive for innovation not only ensures better products for consumers but also promotes job creation in green technology sectors.


Additionally, there is an educational benefit associated with choosing ENERGY STAR units. As consumers become more aware of efficiency ratings and their implications, they gain valuable insights into sustainable practices that can extend beyond appliance choices into other lifestyle areas like water conservation and waste reduction.


In summary, evaluating the benefits of ENERGY STAR units reveals a multifaceted impact that includes economic advantages for individuals, significant contributions toward environmental sustainability, encouragement of technological progress, and increased consumer awareness about energy efficiency practices. These benefits underscore why opting for ENERGY STAR certified products is both a smart choice financially and an ethical decision environmentally-one that aligns with a vision for a sustainable future where we all play our part in preserving natural resources for generations to come.

Signs and Symptoms of Low Refrigerant

Impact of Low Refrigerant on HVAC System Performance

The quest for sustainable living has become a pivotal concern in today's world, with mounting pressures to mitigate environmental impacts and combat climate change. One significant stride toward achieving these objectives is the reduction in energy consumption, particularly through the adoption of ENERGY STAR units. These units represent an innovative leap forward, offering both ecological and economic benefits that resonate with the modern consumer.


ENERGY STAR, a voluntary program established by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, aims to identify and promote energy-efficient products and practices. At its core, the program seeks to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and other pollutants caused by inefficient use of energy. By choosing appliances that bear this mark of efficiency, consumers can significantly lower their household's energy usage.


The reduction in energy consumption achieved through ENERGY STAR units can be likened to trimming away layers of wasteful excess that have long been overlooked in conventional appliances. These units are designed with advanced technologies that optimize performance while minimizing unnecessary power draw. For instance, refrigerators with the ENERGY STAR label use about 15% less energy than non-certified models-a substantial saving when considering the appliance's constant operation.


Beyond environmental considerations, reduced energy consumption translates into direct financial savings for households and businesses alike. Lower utility bills are an appealing incentive for many consumers who find themselves increasingly budget-conscious in today's economic climate. Over time, these savings can offset any initial higher purchase costs associated with ENERGY STAR products, making them a sound investment.


Moreover, embracing ENERGY STAR units plays a crucial role in fostering a culture of sustainability within communities. By collectively reducing energy demand, we lessen our reliance on fossil fuels-an essential step towards diminishing carbon footprints at both micro and macro levels. This collective effort not only contributes to preserving natural resources but also helps stabilize grid demands and reduce the need for new power plants.


In conclusion, reducing energy consumption through ENERGY STAR units is more than just a practical choice; it is a commitment to future generations' well-being. As individuals integrate these efficient solutions into their daily lives, they help pave the way toward a cleaner environment while reaping significant cost benefits themselves. In essence, ENERGY STAR stands as a beacon of practicality meeting responsibility-a harmonious blend that underscores humanity's capacity for innovation towards a greener tomorrow.

Steps for Diagnosing Low Refrigerant Issues

When it comes to home and business management, the phrase "cost savings on utility bills" often rings like sweet music to the ears. In an age where energy consumption is both a financial consideration and an environmental responsibility, evaluating the benefits of ENERGY STAR units becomes not just prudent but essential. These units, known for their energy efficiency, offer a tangible pathway to reducing costs while contributing positively to our planet's health.


ENERGY STAR is more than just a label; it's a promise of efficiency and savings. Products that carry this certification have been rigorously tested and proven to consume less energy than standard models. This translates directly into cost savings on utility bills-one of the most immediate and noticeable benefits for consumers. When you replace conventional appliances with ENERGY STAR-rated versions, you may initially notice a slight increase in upfront costs. However, this initial investment quickly pays off as monthly utility bills begin to shrink.


Let's delve into why these savings occur. ENERGY STAR units are designed with advanced technologies that optimize performance while minimizing energy usage. For example, ENERGY STAR refrigerators use high-efficiency compressors and improved insulation techniques which help maintain consistent temperatures with less power draw. Similarly, ENERGY STAR air conditioners leverage modern refrigerants and variable speed motors to cool spaces efficiently without unnecessary energy waste.


The ripple effect of these technological advancements is significant in terms of financial relief over time. Homeowners can expect reductions in their electricity bills by hundreds of dollars annually depending on the number of upgraded appliances and local energy rates. Businesses that adopt ENERGY STAR lighting systems or office equipment can see even larger percentages shaved off their operational costs given their typically higher volume usage.


Beyond personal financial benefits, there lies an overarching societal advantage: reduced strain on the environment. Energy production often involves burning fossil fuels which emit greenhouse gases contributing to climate change. By lowering individual consumption through ENERGY STAR products, we collectively reduce demand for such harmful practices-a win-win scenario both economically and ecologically.


Moreover, choosing ENERGY STAR products supports broader initiatives aimed at sustainable development and resource conservation. This aligns well with global goals directed towards reducing carbon footprints and promoting renewable energy solutions.


In summary, evaluating the benefits of ENERGY STAR units goes beyond mere numbers on a bill; it's about making informed choices that favor both economic sensibility and environmental stewardship. The cost savings realized from reduced utility bills serve as compelling evidence that efficiency doesn't equate to compromise but rather enhances quality living standards while ensuring responsible resource usage for future generations.


Investing in ENERGY STAR products is not just about saving money today; it's about securing a better tomorrow-for your wallet, your community, and our world at large.

Preventive Measures and Maintenance Tips

The concept of environmental impact has become increasingly significant in discussions about sustainable development and energy efficiency. Among the various initiatives aimed at reducing environmental harm, the ENERGY STAR program stands out as a beacon of progress. Established to promote energy-efficient products and practices, this program plays a pivotal role in minimizing the negative effects that our daily energy consumption imposes on the environment.


Evaluating the benefits of ENERGY STAR units requires us to recognize their substantial contributions to reducing greenhouse gas emissions. By adhering to stringent energy performance specifications, these units consume less electricity than their conventional counterparts. This reduction in energy demand translates directly into fewer fossil fuels being burned for power generation, thereby lowering carbon dioxide and other harmful emissions. As a result, adopting ENERGY STAR certified products supports global efforts to combat climate change by curbing one of its primary drivers: excessive carbon emissions.


Moreover, ENERGY STAR units often integrate cutting-edge technology that enhances overall efficiency and sustainability. For instance, modern appliances such as refrigerators or washing machines with an ENERGY STAR label utilize advanced compressors or motors designed to maximize performance while minimizing waste. This not only reduces the environmental footprint but also leads to significant cost savings for consumers through lower utility bills-a compelling motivation for households and businesses alike to invest in these eco-friendly solutions.


Additionally, beyond individual savings and emission reductions, widespread adoption of ENERGY STAR certified products contributes toward national goals for energy conservation and security. By decreasing overall energy consumption across millions of homes and offices, countries can reduce their reliance on imported fuels, bolster domestic renewable energy sectors, and enhance resilience against fluctuating global oil markets.


In essence, evaluating the benefits of ENERGY STAR units unveils a holistic array of advantages spanning economic gains and ecological preservation. These products exemplify how thoughtful design combined with innovative technology can yield profound positive impacts on both our planet and our pockets. As we continue striving towards a more sustainable future, embracing programs like ENERGY STAR could prove indispensable in harmonizing human progress with environmental stewardship-ensuring that we leave behind a healthier Earth for generations yet to come.

When to Call a Professional HVAC Technician

The quest for sustainable living has become a pressing mandate of our time, and energy efficiency stands as a pivotal element in this pursuit. Among the various initiatives aimed at curbing environmental degradation, ENERGY STAR units have emerged as a significant contributor to reducing greenhouse gas emissions. This essay explores the benefits of ENERGY STAR units, particularly focusing on their role in mitigating climate change by decreasing greenhouse gas emissions.


ENERGY STAR is a program initiated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) that identifies and promotes energy-efficient products and practices. Products with the ENERGY STAR label are designed to use less energy than standard models, without compromising performance or functionality. This efficiency is not just beneficial for consumers seeking to reduce utility bills; it plays an essential role in minimizing carbon footprints at both individual and collective levels.


The primary benefit of ENERGY STAR units lies in their potential to significantly decrease greenhouse gas emissions. Energy production, especially from fossil fuels, is one of the largest sources of carbon dioxide, methane, and other harmful gases that contribute to global warming. By consuming less electricity or fuel, ENERGY STAR products help reduce demand on power plants, many of which rely heavily on burning fossil fuels. Consequently, less fuel combustion translates into fewer emissions being released into the atmosphere.


Consider household appliances such as refrigerators or air conditioners: these devices typically run continuously and account for substantial portions of domestic energy use. By upgrading to ENERGY STAR-certified models, households can slash their energy consumption dramatically-sometimes by over 20% compared to non-certified products. When scaled across millions of homes nationwide or globally, this reduction becomes exponentially impactful in terms of lowering overall greenhouse gas outputs.


Moreover, businesses adopting ENERGY STAR equipment can also reap significant environmental and economic rewards. Commercial buildings are often large-scale consumers of energy due to lighting systems, heating and cooling needs, and electronic devices operation around-the-clock. Transitioning to more efficient technologies helps these facilities operate sustainably while simultaneously cutting operational costs-a win-win scenario that aligns financial incentives with ecological stewardship.


Furthermore, the ripple effects extend beyond immediate emission reductions; they also foster innovation within industries aiming for greater sustainability standards. As demand grows for eco-friendly solutions like those offered by ENERGY STAR products, companies invest more in research and development leading to advances in renewable energies and smarter technologies which further drive down pollution levels across sectors.


In conclusion, evaluating the benefits associated with ENERGY STAR units reveals a compelling case for embracing such innovations-not only from an economic standpoint but crucially from an environmental perspective too. The decrease in greenhouse gas emissions championed through widespread adoption represents one meaningful stride towards combating climate change effectively-a reminder that even seemingly small changes at individual scales can accumulate into profound positive impacts globally when collectively embraced.


Through conscious choices like opting for ENERGY STAR products whenever possible-be it home appliances or office equipment-we each contribute towards safeguarding our planet's future while enjoying tangible benefits today: lower utility bills coupled with cleaner air quality tomorrow make choosing sustainability not just preferable but imperative indeed!

In an era where environmental consciousness is becoming increasingly vital, the concept of sustainable living practices is a beacon guiding us towards a healthier planet. One significant contributor to this mission is the ENERGY STAR program, which has been instrumental in promoting energy efficiency across various sectors. Evaluating the benefits of ENERGY STAR units allows us to appreciate their role in fostering sustainable living and highlights their profound impact on both individual households and the broader environment.


ENERGY STAR units are products certified to meet stringent energy efficiency guidelines set by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). These products range from household appliances like refrigerators, washing machines, and air conditioners, to building materials such as windows and insulation. The primary contribution of these units to sustainable living practices lies in their ability to significantly reduce energy consumption without compromising performance. This reduction not only translates into lower utility bills for consumers but also lessens the demand for electricity generation, which is often reliant on fossil fuels.


The environmental benefits of reduced energy consumption cannot be overstated. By choosing ENERGY STAR units, consumers help decrease greenhouse gas emissions that contribute to global warming. According to data from the EPA, ENERGY STAR products have helped save billions of kilowatt-hours of electricity annually and reduced millions of metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions. This substantial impact makes these units a cornerstone in combating climate change and preserving our ecosystem for future generations.


Beyond environmental advantages, ENERGY STAR units also play a crucial role in promoting economic sustainability. The cost savings on utility bills provide consumers with more disposable income, which can stimulate economic growth when reinvested into other goods and services. Moreover, as demand for energy-efficient products grows, it encourages innovation within industries, leading to advancements in technology and creating jobs focused on green manufacturing and services.


Additionally, ENERGY STAR-certified buildings offer enhanced indoor comfort due to improved temperature regulation and air quality control systems. This not only improves the quality of life for occupants but also enhances productivity in workspaces by providing healthier environments free from pollutants common in less efficient structures.


In conclusion, evaluating the benefits of ENERGY STAR units reveals their multifaceted contribution to sustainable living practices. They serve as practical tools that empower individuals and businesses alike to make responsible choices that align with ecological preservation goals while simultaneously delivering economic incentives. As we continue striving toward a sustainable future, embracing ENERGY STAR technologies represents a tangible step forward-an investment not just in reducing our carbon footprint today but securing a livable world tomorrow.

Energy efficiency has become a cornerstone of modern living, with the ENERGY STAR program leading the charge. As consumers become more conscious of their environmental impact and energy expenditure, ENERGY STAR units have emerged as pivotal players in the quest for sustainable living. Beyond their primary function of reducing energy consumption, these units offer significant performance and comfort improvements that enhance everyday life.


One of the most remarkable benefits of ENERGY STAR appliances is their ability to deliver superior performance without sacrificing quality or convenience. For instance, ENERGY STAR-certified refrigerators are designed to maintain optimal temperature control while using significantly less energy than non-certified models. This means food stays fresher for longer periods, which not only reduces waste but also ensures that families enjoy healthier meals. Similarly, ENERGY STAR dishwashers employ advanced technology to clean dishes more effectively while using less water and energy, saving both time and resources.


Moreover, these appliances are engineered to operate quietly and efficiently. Noise pollution is a common inconvenience associated with older or non-certified models. Whether it's a hum from an outdated air conditioner or the clatter from an old washing machine, such disturbances can disrupt daily life. In contrast, ENERGY STAR units often incorporate noise-reduction features that create a more serene household environment. This enhancement in comfort allows families to engage in conversations or relax without competing with intrusive appliance sounds.


Comfort improvements extend beyond noise reduction, touching on aspects such as indoor climate control and lighting quality. ENERGY STAR heating and cooling systems provide consistent temperatures throughout homes with improved humidity control-a key factor in enhancing indoor air quality and overall comfort levels. These systems adapt seamlessly to seasonal changes, ensuring year-round comfort while minimizing energy use.


In terms of lighting, ENERGY STAR certified bulbs like LEDs offer better illumination compared to traditional incandescent bulbs by providing brighter light at lower energy costs. These bulbs also have longer lifespans, which means fewer replacements and more consistent lighting quality over time-enhancing both visual comfort and economic savings for consumers.


The integration of smart technology into many ENERGY STAR products adds another layer of convenience and efficiency that further improves user experience. Smart thermostats learn homeowners' schedules and preferences over time and optimize heating or cooling accordingly-leading not just to enhanced comfort but also significant energy savings.


In conclusion, the advantages of adopting ENERGY STAR units go well beyond mere reductions in utility bills; they represent a holistic approach to improving lifestyle quality through enhanced performance and increased comfort levels within households. As environmental concerns continue to influence consumer choices, the role of these efficient appliances becomes even more critical-not only in conserving our planet's resources but also in promoting healthier living environments where individuals can thrive comfortably every day.

Enhanced temperature regulation is a pivotal aspect of evaluating the benefits of ENERGY STAR units, demonstrating their remarkable contribution to energy efficiency and environmental sustainability. These units are designed with cutting-edge technology that ensures optimal temperature control, leading to a comfortable indoor environment while significantly reducing energy consumption.


At the heart of enhanced temperature regulation is the intelligent design of ENERGY STAR-certified products. These appliances, ranging from air conditioners to refrigerators and heating systems, utilize advanced sensors and algorithms to maintain consistent temperatures with minimal energy wastage. This precision in temperature control not only provides comfort but also translates into substantial cost savings on utility bills for consumers.


One of the primary benefits of these units is their ability to adjust dynamically to changing environmental conditions. For example, an ENERGY STAR air conditioner can modulate its cooling output based on the room's occupancy and ambient temperature, thereby avoiding unnecessary energy expenditure. Similarly, ENERGY STAR heating systems can efficiently distribute heat throughout a building, ensuring that no area is overheated or underheated.


Moreover, enhanced temperature regulation contributes significantly to reducing greenhouse gas emissions. By optimizing energy use and minimizing waste, these units lower the overall demand for electricity generated from fossil fuels. This reduction in energy consumption aligns perfectly with global efforts to combat climate change by decreasing carbon footprints at both individual and collective levels.


Furthermore, enhanced temperature regulation fosters longer appliance lifespans due to less wear and tear on components that often results from inefficient operation cycles. This durability not only benefits consumers financially by delaying replacement costs but also reduces electronic waste-a growing environmental concern.


In conclusion, enhanced temperature regulation offered by ENERGY STAR units exemplifies how technological advancements can lead to both economic and environmental gains. By providing precise control over indoor climates while conserving energy resources, these units stand as a testament to innovation driving sustainable living practices. As we continue moving towards greener solutions in our everyday lives, embracing such technologies becomes imperative for fostering a healthier planet for future generations.

In recent years, the conversation around energy efficiency has evolved beyond mere cost savings to encompass broader environmental and health benefits. ENERGY STAR units, recognized for their superior energy performance, are at the forefront of this transformation. Among the myriad advantages they offer, improved air quality and humidity control stand out as crucial factors contributing to healthier living environments.


The significance of air quality in our daily lives cannot be overstated. Poor indoor air quality can lead to a range of health issues, from minor irritations such as headaches and fatigue to more severe conditions like respiratory diseases. ENERGY STAR units are designed with advanced filtration systems that significantly reduce pollutants and allergens in the air. By efficiently removing dust, pollen, mold spores, and other airborne particles, these units create a cleaner and healthier indoor atmosphere. This is particularly beneficial for individuals with allergies or asthma, who often suffer from poor indoor air quality.


In addition to purifying the air we breathe, ENERGY STAR units play a vital role in controlling humidity levels within homes and workplaces. Excessive humidity not only makes spaces uncomfortable but also fosters an environment where mold and mildew can thrive. These unwanted guests not only damage property but also pose serious health risks. ENERGY STAR-certified dehumidifiers work efficiently to maintain optimal humidity levels by removing excess moisture from the air. This capability helps prevent mold growth while ensuring that environments remain comfortable and safe for occupants.


The impact of improved air quality and humidity control extends beyond individual households; it contributes positively to societal well-being as well. With fewer pollutants being circulated indoors thanks to these energy-efficient units, there is a reduced need for medical interventions related to poor air quality conditions. This alleviates pressure on healthcare systems while enhancing overall public health.


Furthermore, the environmental benefits associated with ENERGY STAR units should not be overlooked when evaluating their advantages. By consuming less energy than conventional models, these appliances help reduce greenhouse gas emissions-a major contributor to climate change-and decrease reliance on fossil fuels used in power generation.


To sum up, while ENERGY STAR units are celebrated for their ability to lower utility bills through improved energy efficiency, their contributions go far beyond financial savings alone. The enhanced air quality and effective humidity control they provide represent significant steps towards creating healthier living spaces that benefit both individuals' well-being and broader ecological sustainability efforts alike-making them invaluable investments in today's environmentally conscious society.

In the ongoing pursuit of sustainability and energy efficiency, consumers and businesses alike are increasingly seeking ways to reduce their environmental footprint while also reaping financial benefits. One compelling approach to achieving this dual objective is through the adoption of ENERGY STAR certified units. The allure of these products extends beyond their superior energy performance, as they are often accompanied by various economic incentives and rebates that further enhance their appeal. Evaluating the benefits of ENERGY STAR units involves not just understanding their technical advantages but also recognizing the financial opportunities they present.


ENERGY STAR, a program spearheaded by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), is designed to promote energy efficiency across a wide range of appliances and technologies. Products that earn the ENERGY STAR label meet strict criteria for energy use, promising reductions in utility bills without sacrificing performance or quality. This reduction in energy consumption translates directly into cost savings for consumers, both in residential settings and commercial operations.


The financial benefits of investing in ENERGY STAR units are frequently amplified by economic incentives offered at federal, state, and local levels. These incentives come in various forms - from tax credits and deductions to direct rebates on purchases. For instance, homeowners upgrading to ENERGY STAR certified heating systems or cooling appliances may qualify for substantial rebates provided by utility companies aiming to encourage energy-efficient practices among their customers. Similarly, businesses investing in large-scale upgrades can take advantage of tax breaks designed to offset initial investment costs.


These economic incentives serve a dual purpose: they make it financially feasible for more individuals and organizations to adopt sustainable technologies while helping governments achieve broader environmental goals such as reducing greenhouse gas emissions. By lowering the upfront costs associated with purchasing high-efficiency products, rebates effectively shorten the payback period on these investments, making them more attractive from an economic standpoint.


Moreover, embracing ENERGY STAR technology contributes positively towards long-term savings strategies. As utility rates continue to rise globally due to increasing demand and diminishing resources, having appliances that consume less power will invariably lead to lower monthly expenses over time. Businesses can reinvest these savings into other areas such as research and development or workforce expansion, thereby fueling overall growth.


It is important for potential buyers to conduct thorough research when considering which ENERGY STAR products align best with their specific needs and circumstances. Consulting available resources like online databases listing eligible products or reaching out directly to manufacturers for information about current rebate programs can be invaluable steps in this process.


In conclusion, evaluating the benefits of ENERGY STAR units involves looking beyond immediate eco-friendly gains; it requires acknowledging the significant economic advantages facilitated through various incentive programs and rebates available today. While adopting these high-efficiency units indeed reflects a commitment toward sustainable living practices, it is equally an astute financial decision supported by tangible monetary returns both now and into the future. As awareness grows around these dual advantages - ecological stewardship paired with fiscal responsibility - more households and enterprises are likely to join this movement towards smarter energy consumption choices.

When considering the adoption of ENERGY STAR units, many consumers are initially drawn by the promise of reduced energy consumption and lower utility bills. However, one of the most significant yet often overlooked benefits is the availability of tax credits and rebates associated with these energy-efficient appliances. Understanding how these financial incentives work can greatly enhance the appeal and affordability of making an environmentally conscious choice.


ENERGY STAR is a program spearheaded by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) that certifies products meeting high efficiency standards, thereby helping reduce greenhouse gas emissions. While environmental benefits are paramount, fiscal incentives play a crucial role in encouraging widespread adoption among consumers.


Tax credits are direct reductions in the amount of taxes owed to the government. For individuals purchasing qualified ENERGY STAR units, these credits can significantly offset initial purchase costs. Unlike deductions, which reduce taxable income, tax credits directly decrease tax liability, offering a more substantial financial benefit.


Rebates further incentivize purchases by providing partial refunds post-purchase. These rebates may come from federal or state programs or even utility companies eager to promote energy conservation within their service areas. Rebates typically require proof of purchase and installation but can offer immediate savings that make energy-efficient upgrades financially viable for many households.


The availability and specifics of these programs can vary widely depending on location and time period due to changing governmental policies and budget allocations. It is essential for consumers to remain informed about current offerings when planning purchases. Consulting resources like the official ENERGY STAR website or local utility companies can provide up-to-date information on qualifying products and applicable incentives.


Additionally, certain regions might offer supplementary local incentives tailored to specific community goals or environmental challenges. These localized efforts complement broader initiatives by addressing unique regional issues, such as high energy demand during peak seasons or reliance on non-renewable resources.


In conclusion, while choosing ENERGY STAR units undoubtedly contributes to environmental preservation through reduced carbon footprints and enhanced efficiency, understanding the financial advantages through available tax credits and rebates is equally important. By leveraging these incentives, consumers not only support sustainable practices but also make prudent economic decisions that benefit their wallets both immediately through rebates and annually via reduced taxes. As such, evaluating these benefits should be an integral part of any decision-making process related to energy-efficient home improvements.

In today's fast-paced world, where energy efficiency and sustainability have become paramount, homeowners are increasingly turning to ENERGY STAR units for their long-term financial benefits. These units, certified by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), promise not only a reduction in energy consumption but also significant savings over time. As we delve into evaluating these benefits, it becomes clear that investing in ENERGY STAR appliances is more than just an environmentally conscious decision-it's a financially savvy one as well.


To begin with, the most immediate financial benefit for homeowners who choose ENERGY STAR units is the reduction in energy bills. These appliances are designed to consume less electricity and water without compromising on performance. For instance, an ENERGY STAR-certified refrigerator can use 10-15% less energy than non-certified models. Over time, this translates into noticeable savings on monthly utility bills. The cumulative effect of these savings can be substantial, especially when multiple ENERGY STAR appliances are used throughout a home.


Moreover, many local governments and utilities offer rebates and incentives for purchasing ENERGY STAR products. These programs aim to encourage consumers to opt for energy-efficient options by offsetting some of the initial costs associated with upgrading or replacing older appliances. By taking advantage of these rebates, homeowners can reduce upfront expenses significantly while still reaping long-term benefits.


Another critical aspect to consider is the increase in property value associated with having ENERGY STAR units installed. As awareness about climate change and resource conservation grows, there is a rising demand among buyers for homes equipped with sustainable features. A home fitted with energy-efficient appliances not only appeals to eco-conscious buyers but also stands out in a competitive real estate market. Consequently, sellers may find that their investment in ENERGY STAR products yields higher resale values compared to homes lacking such features.


Additionally, ENERGY STAR units contribute positively towards reducing environmental impact-a factor that indirectly supports long-term financial stability. By lowering household carbon emissions and conserving natural resources like water and fossil fuels, homeowners play a crucial role in mitigating climate-related risks that could potentially disrupt economic stability globally.


Furthermore, opting for durable and efficient appliances aligns with cost-saving strategies linked to maintenance and repair expenses over time. ENERGY STAR products often come equipped with advanced technologies that enhance durability while minimizing wear-and-tear issues typically encountered by standard models-leading ultimately towards reduced replacement costs down the line.


In conclusion, embracing ENERGY STAR-certified appliances presents multiple layers of financial advantages for homeowners seeking both immediate relief from high utility fees as well as lasting economic gains through increased property values coupled alongside government-sponsored incentives aimed at promoting eco-friendliness within residential spaces nationwide-all whilst contributing meaningfully towards global sustainability efforts aimed at preserving our planet's finite resources responsibly across generations yet unborn!

When evaluating the benefits of ENERGY STAR units, it is essential to draw comparisons with non-ENERGY STAR counterparts. This approach not only highlights the advantages of choosing ENERGY STAR certified products but also underscores their impact on energy efficiency, cost savings, and environmental sustainability.


Firstly, ENERGY STAR units are designed with advanced technologies that significantly reduce energy consumption compared to non-ENERGY STAR models. These technologies often include improved insulation, high-efficiency compressors, and optimized system operations. As a result, ENERGY STAR units consume less electricity while maintaining or even improving performance levels. In contrast, non-ENERGY STAR units may rely on outdated technologies that are less efficient and more resource-intensive.


The financial implications of choosing an ENERGY STAR unit over a non-certified one are noteworthy. Although the initial purchase price of an ENERGY STAR unit might be slightly higher in some cases, the long-term cost benefits outweigh this upfront investment. The reduced energy consumption translates into lower utility bills for consumers. Over time, these savings can accumulate significantly, making the investment in ENERGY STAR products economically advantageous.


Moreover, from an environmental perspective, opting for ENERGY STAR units contributes positively by reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Since these units require less energy to operate efficiently, they help decrease the demand for electricity generated from fossil fuels-a major source of carbon emissions. Non-ENERGY STAR units typically have higher energy demands and subsequently contribute more to environmental degradation through increased emissions.


In addition to economic and ecological benefits, ENERGY STAR products often come with enhanced features that improve user experience and satisfaction. For instance, they might offer quieter operation or smart technology integration for better control and monitoring of usage patterns-features that are not always available in non-certified models.


Lastly, choosing products with the ENERGY STAR label supports broader national and global efforts towards sustainable development goals. By promoting energy-efficient practices through informed consumer choices, individuals play a role in driving demand for greener technologies and encouraging manufacturers to innovate further in this direction.


In conclusion, when comparing ENERGY STAR units with their non-certified counterparts, it becomes evident that there are multifaceted benefits ranging from reduced operational costs and lower environmental impact to enhanced user experience and supporting sustainability initiatives. Thus, investing in ENERGY STAR certified products is a prudent decision not just for individual consumers but also for society at large as we strive towards a more sustainable future.

When considering the adoption of ENERGY STAR units, it is crucial to understand the differences in efficiency and performance metrics that distinguish these appliances from their non-certified counterparts. ENERGY STAR, a program backed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), aims to help consumers identify products that offer superior energy efficiency without compromising performance. By evaluating these metrics, we can better appreciate the benefits ENERGY STAR units provide both environmentally and economically.


Efficiency is often at the forefront of discussions surrounding ENERGY STAR products. These units are designed to use less energy than standard models, which results in reduced utility bills for consumers. For instance, an ENERGY STAR certified refrigerator might use 10-15% less energy than a conventional model. This difference in energy consumption not only translates into direct savings on electricity bills but also contributes to decreased demand on power plants, leading to reduced greenhouse gas emissions.


Performance metrics for ENERGY STAR units are equally important as they ensure that efficiency gains do not come at the expense of functionality or user satisfaction. Products bearing the ENERGY STAR label undergo rigorous testing to guarantee they meet or exceed consumer expectations in terms of performance while consuming less energy. For example, an ENERGY STAR washing machine should deliver exceptional cleaning power while using significantly less water and electricity compared to traditional models.


The evaluation process for these units involves a comprehensive assessment of both quantitative and qualitative aspects. Quantitative assessments focus on measurable data such as kilowatt-hours consumed per year or gallons of water used per load. Meanwhile, qualitative evaluations consider factors like noise levels emitted by appliances or user-friendly features that enhance convenience and satisfaction.


One might wonder if there is indeed a trade-off between efficiency and performance when selecting ENERGY STAR units over conventional options. However, advancements in technology have allowed manufacturers to design products that excel in both areas simultaneously. Innovations such as improved insulation materials, advanced compressors, and smart sensors enable these appliances to outperform older models while still minimizing their ecological footprint.


In conclusion, when evaluating the benefits of ENERGY STAR units through differences in efficiency and performance metrics, it becomes evident that these products offer substantial advantages over non-certified options. They save consumers money through lower energy consumption, contribute positively to environmental conservation efforts by reducing emissions, and maintain high standards of functionality and reliability. As awareness about climate change continues to grow, choosing ENERGY STAR certified appliances represents a thoughtful decision towards sustainable living without sacrificing quality or comfort.

When considering the adoption of ENERGY STAR units, one of the most crucial aspects to evaluate is the balance between initial investment and long-term savings. This analysis is particularly significant for homeowners and businesses looking to make environmentally conscious decisions while also being mindful of financial implications.


At first glance, ENERGY STAR units often come with a higher upfront cost compared to non-certified alternatives. This initial investment can be discouraging for those who are primarily focused on immediate budget constraints. However, it's essential to delve deeper beyond the sticker price to fully understand the potential benefits these units offer over time.


ENERGY STAR appliances and equipment are designed to be more energy-efficient, which directly translates into reduced utility bills. While the initial purchase might require a heftier investment, these products typically consume less electricity or water, leading to lower operational costs throughout their lifespan. For instance, an ENERGY STAR certified refrigerator might save a household upwards of $100 annually in electricity costs compared with its conventional counterpart. Over several years, these savings accumulate significantly, effectively offsetting the higher purchase price.


Furthermore, many governments and utilities offer rebates or tax incentives for purchasing ENERGY STAR certified products. These financial incentives can alleviate part of the initial cost burden and make energy-efficient choices more accessible. When factoring in these potential rebates alongside reduced utility bills, the payback period for an ENERGY STAR unit can be surprisingly short.


In addition to direct financial savings, there are also indirect benefits that should be considered in this analysis. Energy-efficient appliances contribute positively by reducing greenhouse gas emissions and conserving natural resources. For environmentally-conscious consumers or businesses committed to sustainability goals, this added value aligns with broader ecological objectives that go beyond mere cost considerations.


Moreover, upgrading to ENERGY STAR units can increase property value. Homebuyers today are increasingly aware of energy efficiency standards and may place a premium on homes equipped with such features due to anticipated long-term savings on utility bills.


Critically evaluating both sides of this equation-the upfront costs versus ongoing savings-reveals that while the initial investment in ENERGY STAR units might seem daunting at first glance, they present substantial economic advantages over time. In fact, when viewed through a long-term lens that includes energy conservation benefits and potential incentives, investing in ENERGY STAR products often emerges as not only financially sound but also environmentally responsible.


In conclusion, when conducting an initial investment vs long-term savings analysis for ENERGY STAR units under the topic "Evaluating Benefits," it becomes clear that these products offer considerable advantages that extend well beyond their initial cost. By prioritizing energy efficiency today, consumers and businesses alike can enjoy sustained economic rewards while contributing positively towards environmental preservation-a win-win scenario worth embracing wholeheartedly.

When it comes to mobile homes, energy efficiency is a crucial consideration for owners who are both environmentally conscious and budget-savvy. One effective way to enhance energy efficiency in mobile homes is by evaluating the benefits of ENERGY STAR units. ENERGY STAR is a widely recognized symbol for energy efficiency, providing simple, credible, and unbiased information that consumers rely on to make well-informed decisions.


Firstly, reducing energy costs is perhaps the most compelling benefit of investing in ENERGY STAR appliances and systems. Mobile homes traditionally face higher energy consumption due to their design and construction materials. However, ENERGY STAR certified products are specifically engineered to use less energy while providing the same level of performance as non-certified alternatives. This means that owners can enjoy lower utility bills without sacrificing comfort or convenience.


In addition to cost savings, ENERGY STAR units contribute significantly to environmental conservation. By using less electricity or gas, these products help reduce greenhouse gas emissions and other pollutants associated with energy production. For mobile home owners committed to reducing their carbon footprint, choosing ENERGY STAR certified products aligns with broader sustainability goals.


Another important consideration is the potential increase in property value when upgrading to ENERGY STAR appliances and systems. Energy-efficient features are increasingly desirable among buyers who are looking for long-term savings and environmental responsibility in their homes. Thus, investing in these upgrades not only provides immediate financial benefits but also enhances resale value.


Moreover, many regions offer incentives such as tax credits or rebates for purchasing ENERGY STAR certified products. These programs can offset initial costs and make upgrading more accessible financially. Mobile home owners should explore available local incentives as part of their decision-making process.


Finally, durability and quality assurance are significant factors when considering ENERGY STAR units. Products that earn the label must meet strict guidelines set by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), ensuring they perform efficiently over time without compromising on quality or functionality.


In conclusion, evaluating the benefits of ENERGY STAR units offers numerous advantages for mobile home owners seeking energy efficiency improvements. From cost savings and environmental impact reduction to increased property value and access to financial incentives, these products present a compelling case for consideration during any home improvement project focused on sustainability and long-term economic gains. As consumers become more aware of their ecological footprints and seek ways to combat rising utility costs, embracing ENERGY STAR certified options remains a practical and forward-thinking choice for mobile home living.

When it comes to selecting an ENERGY STAR HVAC system, there are several crucial factors to consider. These considerations not only help ensure you select the most appropriate unit for your needs but also maximize the benefits of choosing an ENERGY STAR certified system. By understanding these factors, you can make an informed decision that enhances comfort, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness in your home or business.


First and foremost, energy efficiency stands at the core of why one should choose an ENERGY STAR HVAC system. ENERGY STAR certified units are designed to consume less energy compared to non-certified models. This translates into lower utility bills and a reduced environmental footprint. Therefore, when evaluating different systems, it's essential to check their Seasonal Energy Efficiency Ratio (SEER) or Heating Seasonal Performance Factor (HSPF) ratings. Higher ratings indicate greater efficiency and potential savings on energy costs over time.


Another factor to consider is the size of the HVAC system relative to your space requirements. An improperly sized unit can lead to inefficiencies; a system that's too small will struggle to heat or cool effectively, while one that's too large may cycle on and off frequently, wasting energy and increasing wear and tear. Consulting with a professional who can perform a load calculation based on your home's square footage, insulation levels, and window orientation ensures that you select a unit that meets your specific demands.


The climate in which you live also plays a significant role in determining the most suitable ENERGY STAR HVAC system. Different regions have varying heating and cooling needs; thus, it's important to choose a model that excels under local weather conditions. For instance, if you live in a colder area, prioritizing a heat pump with high HSPF ratings could be beneficial for efficient heating during winter months.


Furthermore, considering the integration of modern technology can enhance the benefits of an ENERGY STAR system. Many newer models come equipped with smart thermostats that allow for precise control over temperature settings through mobile apps or voice commands. This feature not only provides convenience but also optimizes energy use by adjusting temperatures based on occupancy patterns.


Additionally, it's prudent to evaluate the total cost of ownership beyond just the initial purchase price. Consider maintenance requirements and potential repair costs over time as these will impact long-term savings associated with operating an efficient HVAC system. Some manufacturers offer extended warranties or service plans which may add peace of mind regarding future expenses.


In conclusion, while selecting an ENERGY STAR HVAC system requires careful consideration of various factors such as energy efficiency ratings, size appropriateness for your space, compatibility with local climate conditions, technological enhancements like smart thermostats, and overall lifetime costs doing so promises substantial benefits including reduced energy bills and improved environmental sustainability. By investing time upfront into researching these elements thoroughly before making your choice ensures optimal performance from your new heating or cooling solution while enjoying all advantages afforded by choosing ENERGY STAR certification.

When considering the benefits of ENERGY STAR units, it's crucial to recognize that proper installation and regular maintenance are integral components of their effectiveness. ENERGY STAR units, known for their energy efficiency and environmental friendliness, offer significant savings on utility bills and reduce carbon footprints. However, these advantages are only fully realized when the units are installed correctly and maintained diligently.


Proper installation is the first step in ensuring that an ENERGY STAR unit functions as intended. This process involves more than simply setting up the unit; it requires a specialized understanding of the system's requirements and an adherence to manufacturer guidelines. Incorrect installation can lead to several issues, such as reduced efficiency, increased energy consumption, or even system failure. For instance, HVAC systems may leak air if ductwork is not sealed properly during installation, negating any potential energy savings. Similarly, improperly installed insulation or windows may allow drafts that compromise indoor temperature control.


Once installed correctly, regular maintenance becomes essential to sustain the performance and longevity of ENERGY STAR units. Maintenance tasks can include cleaning filters, checking seals for air leaks, inspecting electrical connections, and calibrating controls to ensure optimal operation. Without routine maintenance, even the most efficient systems can become inefficient over time due to wear and tear or minor malfunctions going unnoticed.


Moreover, consistent upkeep helps prevent costly repairs down the line by identifying problems before they escalate into major issues. This proactive approach not only safeguards your investment but also ensures continuous savings on energy costs. In addition to financial benefits, maintaining these units supports environmental goals by reducing unnecessary waste from premature replacements or excessive energy use caused by malfunctioning systems.


In conclusion, while ENERGY STAR units present numerous advantages in terms of efficiency and sustainability, these benefits hinge on proper installation and maintenance practices. By committing to both accurate setup and ongoing care of these systems, homeowners and businesses alike can maximize their investments' returns while contributing positively to environmental conservation efforts. As we strive towards a more sustainable future, recognizing the importance of these practices will help us harness the full potential of ENERGY STAR technologies effectively.

 

An air filter being cleaned

Indoor air quality (IAQ) is the air quality within buildings and structures. Poor indoor air quality due to indoor air pollution is known to affect the health, comfort, and well-being of building occupants. It has also been linked to sick building syndrome, respiratory issues, reduced productivity, and impaired learning in schools. Common pollutants of indoor air include: secondhand tobacco smoke, air pollutants from indoor combustion, radon, molds and other allergens, carbon monoxide, volatile organic compounds, legionella and other bacteria, asbestos fibers, carbon dioxide,[1] ozone and particulates.

Source control, filtration, and the use of ventilation to dilute contaminants are the primary methods for improving indoor air quality. Although ventilation is an integral component of maintaining good indoor air quality, it may not be satisfactory alone.[2] In scenarios where outdoor pollution would deteriorate indoor air quality, other treatment devices such as filtration may also be necessary.[3]

IAQ is evaluated through collection of air samples, monitoring human exposure to pollutants, analysis of building surfaces, and computer modeling of air flow inside buildings. IAQ is part of indoor environmental quality (IEQ), along with other factors that exert an influence on physical and psychological aspects of life indoors (e.g., lighting, visual quality, acoustics, and thermal comfort).[4]

Indoor air pollution is a major health hazard in developing countries and is commonly referred to as "household air pollution" in that context.[5] It is mostly relating to cooking and heating methods by burning biomass fuel, in the form of wood, charcoal, dung, and crop residue, in indoor environments that lack proper ventilation. Millions of people, primarily women and children, face serious health risks. In total, about three billion people in developing countries are affected by this problem. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that cooking-related indoor air pollution causes 3.8 million annual deaths.[6] The Global Burden of Disease study estimated the number of deaths in 2017 at 1.6 million.[7]

Definition

[edit]

For health reasons it is crucial to breathe clean air, free from chemicals and toxicants as much as possible. It is estimated that humans spend approximately 90% of their lifetime indoors[8] and that indoor air pollution in some places can be much worse than that of the ambient air.[9][10]

Various factors contribute to high concentrations of pollutants indoors, ranging from influx of pollutants from external sources, off-gassing by furniture, furnishings including carpets, indoor activities (cooking, cleaning, painting, smoking, etc. in homes to using office equipment in offices), thermal comfort parameters such as temperature, humidity, airflow and physio-chemical properties of the indoor air.[citation needed] Air pollutants can enter a building in many ways, including through open doors or windows. Poorly maintained air conditioners/ventilation systems can harbor mold, bacteria, and other contaminants, which are then circulated throughout indoor spaces, contributing to respiratory problems and allergies.

There have been many debates among indoor air quality specialists about the proper definition of indoor air quality and specifically what constitutes "acceptable" indoor air quality.

Health effects

[edit]
Share of deaths from indoor air pollution. Darker colors mean higher numbers.

IAQ is significant for human health as humans spend a large proportion of their time in indoor environments. Americans and Europeans on average spend approximately 90% of their time indoors.[11][12]

The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that 3.2 million people die prematurely every year from illnesses attributed to indoor air pollution caused by indoor cooking, with over 237 thousand of these being children under 5. These include around an eighth of all global ischaemic heart disease, stroke, and lung cancer deaths. Overall the WHO estimated that poor indoor air quality resulted in the loss of 86 million healthy life years in 2019.[13]

Studies in the UK and Europe show exposure to indoor air pollutants, chemicals and biological contamination can irritate the upper airway system, trigger or exacerbate asthma and other respiratory or cardiovascular conditions, and may even have carcinogenic effects.[14][15][16][17][18][19]

Poor indoor air quality can cause sick building syndrome. Symptoms include burning of the eyes, scratchy throat, blocked nose, and headaches.[20]

Common pollutants

[edit]

Generated by indoor combustion

[edit]
a 3-stone stove
A traditional wood-fired 3-stone stove in Guatemala, which causes indoor air pollution

Indoor combustion, such as for cooking or heating, is a major cause of indoor air pollution and causes significant health harms and premature deaths. Hydrocarbon fires cause air pollution. Pollution is caused by both biomass and fossil fuels of various types, but some forms of fuels are more harmful than others.

Indoor fire can produce black carbon particles, nitrogen oxides, sulfur oxides, and mercury compounds, among other emissions.[21] Around 3 billion people cook over open fires or on rudimentary cook stoves. Cooking fuels are coal, wood, animal dung, and crop residues.[22] IAQ is a particular concern in low and middle-income countries where such practices are common.[23]

Cooking using natural gas (also called fossil gas, methane gas or simply gas) is associated with poorer indoor air quality. Combustion of gas produces nitrogen dioxide and carbon monixide, and can lead to increased concentrations of nitrogen dioxide throughout the home environment which is linked to respiratory issues and diseases.[24][25]

Carbon monoxide

[edit]

One of the most acutely toxic indoor air contaminants is carbon monoxide (CO), a colourless and odourless gas that is a by-product of incomplete combustion. Carbon monoxide may be emitted from tobacco smoke and generated from malfunctioning fuel burning stoves (wood, kerosene, natural gas, propane) and fuel burning heating systems (wood, oil, natural gas) and from blocked flues connected to these appliances.[26] In developed countries the main sources of indoor CO emission come from cooking and heating devices that burn fossil fuels and are faulty, incorrectly installed or poorly maintained.[27] Appliance malfunction may be due to faulty installation or lack of maintenance and proper use.[26] In low- and middle-income countries the most common sources of CO in homes are burning biomass fuels and cigarette smoke.[27]

Health effects of CO poisoning may be acute or chronic and can occur unintentionally or intentionally (self-harm). By depriving the brain of oxygen, acute exposure to carbon monoxide may have effects on the neurological system (headache, nausea, dizziness, alteration in consciousness and subjective weakness), the cardiovascular and respiratory systems (myocardial infarction, shortness of breath, or rapid breathing, respiratory failure). Acute exposure can also lead to long-term neurological effects such as cognitive and behavioural changes. Severe CO poisoning may lead to unconsciousness, coma and death. Chronic exposure to low concentrations of carbon monoxide may lead to lethargy, headaches, nausea, flu-like symptoms and neuropsychological and cardiovascular issues.[28][26]

The WHO recommended levels of indoor CO exposure in 24 hours is 4 mg/m3.[29] Acute exposure should not exceed 10 mg/m3 in 8 hours, 35 mg/m3 in one hour and 100 mg/m3 in 15 minutes.[27]

Secondhand tobacco smoke

[edit]

Secondhand smoke is tobacco smoke which affects people other than the 'active' smoker. It is made up of the exhaled smoke (15%) and mostly of smoke coming from the burning end of the cigarette, known as sidestream smoke (85%).[30]

Secondhand smoke contains more than 7000 chemicals, of which hundreds are harmful to health.[30] Secondhand tobacco smoke includes both a gaseous and a particulate materials which, with particular hazards arising from levels of carbon monoxide and very small particulates (fine particulate matter, especially PM2.5 and PM10) which get into the bronchioles and alveoles in the lung.[31] Inhaling secondhand smoke on multiple occasions can cause asthma, pneumonia, lung cancer, and sudden infant death syndrome, among other conditions.[32]

Thirdhand smoke (THS) refers to chemicals that settle on objects and bodies indoors after smoking. Exposure to thirdhand smoke can happen even after the actual cigarette smoke is not present anymore and affect those entering the indoor environment much later. Toxic substances of THS can react with other chemicals in the air and produce new toxic chemicals that are otherwise not present in cigarettes.[33]

The only certain method to improve indoor air quality as regards secondhand smoke is to eliminate smoking indoors.[34] Indoor e-cigarette use also increases home particulate matter concentrations.[35]

Particulates

[edit]

Atmospheric particulate matter, also known as particulates, can be found indoors and can affect the health of occupants. Indoor particulate matter can come from different indoor sources or be created as secondary aerosols through indoor gas-to-particle reactions. They can also be outdoor particles that enter indoors. These indoor particles vary widely in size, ranging from nanomet (nanoparticles/ultrafine particles emitted from combustion sources) to micromet (resuspensed dust).[36] Particulate matter can also be produced through cooking activities. Frying produces higher concentrations than boiling or grilling and cooking meat produces higher concentrations than cooking vegetables.[37] Preparing a Thanksgiving dinner can produce very high concentrations of particulate matter, exceeding 300 μg/m3.[38]

Particulates can penetrate deep into the lungs and brain from blood streams, causing health problems such as heart disease, lung disease, cancer and preterm birth.[39]

Generated from building materials, furnishing and consumer products

[edit]

Volatile organic compounds

[edit]

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) include a variety of chemicals, some of which may have short- and long-term adverse health effects. There are numerous sources of VOCs indoors, which means that their concentrations are consistently higher indoors (up to ten times higher) than outdoors.[40] Some VOCs are emitted directly indoors, and some are formed through the subsequent chemical reactions that can occur in the gas-phase, or on surfaces.[41][42] VOCs presenting health hazards include benzene, formaldehyde, tetrachloroethylene and trichloroethylene.[43]

VOCs are emitted by thousands of indoor products. Examples include: paints, varnishes, waxes and lacquers, paint strippers, cleaning and personal care products, pesticides, building materials and furnishings, office equipment such as copiers and printers, correction fluids and carbonless copy paper, graphics and craft materials including glues and adhesives, permanent markers, and photographic solutions.[44] Chlorinated drinking water releases chloroform when hot water is used in the home. Benzene is emitted from fuel stored in attached garages.

Human activities such as cooking and cleaning can also emit VOCs.[45][46] Cooking can release long-chain aldehydes and alkanes when oil is heated and terpenes can be released when spices are prepared and/or cooked.[45] Leaks of natural gas from cooking appliances have been linked to elevated levels of VOCs including benzene in homes in the USA.[47] Cleaning products contain a range of VOCs, including monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes, alcohols and esters. Once released into the air, VOCs can undergo reactions with ozone and hydroxyl radicals to produce other VOCs, such as formaldehyde.[46]

Health effects include eye, nose, and throat irritation; headaches, loss of coordination, nausea; and damage to the liver, kidney, and central nervous system.[48]

Testing emissions from building materials used indoors has become increasingly common for floor coverings, paints, and many other important indoor building materials and finishes.[49] Indoor materials such as gypsum boards or carpet act as VOC 'sinks', by trapping VOC vapors for extended periods of time, and releasing them by outgassing. The VOCs can also undergo transformation at the surface through interaction with ozone.[42] In both cases, these delayed emissions can result in chronic and low-level exposures to VOCs.[50]

Several initiatives aim to reduce indoor air contamination by limiting VOC emissions from products. There are regulations in France and in Germany, and numerous voluntary ecolabels and rating systems containing low VOC emissions criteria such as EMICODE,[51] M1,[52] Blue Angel[53] and Indoor Air Comfort[54] in Europe, as well as California Standard CDPH Section 01350[55] and several others in the US. Due to these initiatives an increasing number of low-emitting products became available to purchase.

At least 18 microbial VOCs (MVOCs) have been characterised[56][57] including 1-octen-3-ol (mushroom alcohol), 3-Methylfuran, 2-pentanol, 2-hexanone, 2-heptanone, 3-octanone, 3-octanol, 2-octen-1-ol, 1-octene, 2-pentanone, 2-nonanone, borneol, geosmin, 1-butanol, 3-methyl-1-butanol, 3-methyl-2-butanol, and thujopsene. The last four are products of Stachybotrys chartarum, which has been linked with sick building syndrome.[56]

Asbestos fibers

[edit]

Many common building materials used before 1975 contain asbestos, such as some floor tiles, ceiling tiles, shingles, fireproofing, heating systems, pipe wrap, taping muds, mastics, and other insulation materials. Normally, significant releases of asbestos fiber do not occur unless the building materials are disturbed, such as by cutting, sanding, drilling, or building remodelling. Removal of asbestos-containing materials is not always optimal because the fibers can be spread into the air during the removal process. A management program for intact asbestos-containing materials is often recommended instead.

When asbestos-containing material is damaged or disintegrates, microscopic fibers are dispersed into the air. Inhalation of asbestos fibers over long exposure times is associated with increased incidence of lung cancer, mesothelioma, and asbestosis. The risk of lung cancer from inhaling asbestos fibers is significantly greater for smokers. The symptoms of disease do not usually appear until about 20 to 30 years after the first exposure to asbestos.

Although all asbestos is hazardous, products that are friable, e.g. sprayed coatings and insulation, pose a significantly higher hazard as they are more likely to release fibers to the air.[58]

Microplastics

[edit]

Microplastic is a type of airborne particulates and is found to prevail in air.[59][60][61][62] A 2017 study found indoor airborne microfiber concentrations between 1.0 and 60.0 microfibers per cubic meter (33% of which were found to be microplastics).[63] Airborne microplastic dust can be produced during renovation, building, bridge and road reconstruction projects[64] and the use of power tools.[65]

Ozone

[edit]

Indoors ozone (O3) is produced by certain high-voltage electric devices (such as air ionizers), and as a by-product of other types of pollution. It appears in lower concentrations indoors than outdoors, usually at 0.2-0.7 of the outdoor concentration.[66] Typically, most ozone is lost to surface reactions indoors, rather than to reactions in air, due to the large surface to volume ratios found indoors.[67]

Outdoor air used for ventilation may have sufficient ozone to react with common indoor pollutants as well as skin oils and other common indoor air chemicals or surfaces. Particular concern is warranted when using "green" cleaning products based on citrus or terpene extracts, because these chemicals react very quickly with ozone to form toxic and irritating chemicals[46] as well as fine and ultrafine particles.[68] Ventilation with outdoor air containing elevated ozone concentrations may complicate remediation attempts.[69]

The WHO standard for ozone concentration is 60 μg/m3 for long-term exposure and 100 μg/m3 as the maximum average over an 8-hour period.[29] The EPA standard for ozone concentration is 0.07 ppm average over an 8-hour period.[70]

Biological agents

[edit]

Mold and other allergens

[edit]

Occupants in buildings can be exposed to fungal spores, cell fragments, or mycotoxins which can arise from a host of means, but there are two common classes: (a) excess moisture induced growth of mold colonies and (b) natural substances released into the air such as animal dander and plant pollen.[71]

While mold growth is associated with high moisture levels,[72] it is likely to grow when a combination of favorable conditions arises. As well as high moisture levels, these conditions include suitable temperatures, pH and nutrient sources.[73] Mold grows primarily on surfaces, and it reproduces by releasing spores, which can travel and settle in different locations. When these spores experience appropriate conditions, they can germinate and lead to mycelium growth.[74] Different mold species favor different environmental conditions to germinate and grow, some being more hydrophilic (growing at higher levels of relative humidity) and other more xerophilic (growing at levels of relative humidity as low as 75–80%).[74][75]

Mold growth can be inhibited by keeping surfaces at conditions that are further from condensation, with relative humidity levels below 75%. This usually translates to a relative humidity of indoor air below 60%, in agreement with the guidelines for thermal comfort that recommend a relative humidity between 40 and 60 %. Moisture buildup in buildings may arise from water penetrating areas of the building envelope or fabric, from plumbing leaks, rainwater or groundwater penetration, or from condensation due to improper ventilation, insufficient heating or poor thermal quality of the building envelope.[76] Even something as simple as drying clothes indoors on radiators can increase the risk of mold growth, if the humidity produced is not able to escape the building via ventilation.[77]

Mold predominantly affects the airways and lungs. Known effects of mold on health include asthma development and exacerbation,[78] with children and elderly at greater risk of more severe health impacts.[79] Infants in homes with mold have a much greater risk of developing asthma and allergic rhinitis.[80][71] More than half of adult workers in moldy or humid buildings suffer from nasal or sinus symptoms due to mold exposure.[71] Some varieties of mold contain toxic compounds (mycotoxins). However, exposure to hazardous levels of mycotoxin via inhalation is not possible in most cases, as toxins are produced by the fungal body and are not at significant levels in the released spores.

Legionella

[edit]

Legionnaires' disease is caused by a waterborne bacterium Legionella that grows best in slow-moving or still, warm water. The primary route of exposure is through the creation of an aerosol effect, most commonly from evaporative cooling towers or showerheads. A common source of Legionella in commercial buildings is from poorly placed or maintained evaporative cooling towers, which often release water in an aerosol which may enter nearby ventilation intakes. Outbreaks in medical facilities and nursing homes, where patients are immuno-suppressed and immuno-weak, are the most commonly reported cases of Legionellosis. More than one case has involved outdoor fountains at public attractions. The presence of Legionella in commercial building water supplies is highly under-reported, as healthy people require heavy exposure to acquire infection.

Legionella testing typically involves collecting water samples and surface swabs from evaporative cooling basins, shower heads, faucets/taps, and other locations where warm water collects. The samples are then cultured and colony forming units (cfu) of Legionella are quantified as cfu/liter.

Legionella is a parasite of protozoans such as amoeba, and thus requires conditions suitable for both organisms. The bacterium forms a biofilm which is resistant to chemical and antimicrobial treatments, including chlorine. Remediation for Legionella outbreaks in commercial buildings vary, but often include very hot water flushes (160 °F (71 °C)), sterilisation of standing water in evaporative cooling basins, replacement of shower heads, and, in some cases, flushes of heavy metal salts. Preventive measures include adjusting normal hot water levels to allow for 120 °F (49 °C) at the tap, evaluating facility design layout, removing faucet aerators, and periodic testing in suspect areas.

Other bacteria

[edit]
Airborne bacteria

There are many bacteria of health significance found in indoor air and on indoor surfaces. The role of microbes in the indoor environment is increasingly studied using modern gene-based analysis of environmental samples. Currently, efforts are under way to link microbial ecologists and indoor air scientists to forge new methods for analysis and to better interpret the results.[81]

A large fraction of the bacteria found in indoor air and dust are shed from humans. Among the most important bacteria known to occur in indoor air are Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae.[citation needed]

Virus

[edit]
Ninth floor layout of the Metropole Hotel in Hong Kong, showing where an outbreak of the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) occurred

Viruses can also be a concern for indoor air quality. During the 2002–2004 SARS outbreak, virus-laden aerosols were found to have seeped into bathrooms from the bathroom floor drains, exacerbated by the draw of bathroom exhaust fans, resulting in the rapid spread of SARS in Amoy Gardens in Hong Kong.[82][83] Elsewhere in Hong Kong, SARS CoV RNA was found on the carpet and in the air intake vents of the Metropole Hotel, which showed that secondary environmental contamination could generate infectious aerosols and resulted in superspreading events.[84]

Carbon dioxide

[edit]

Humans are the main indoor source of carbon dioxide (CO2) in most buildings. Indoor CO2 levels are an indicator of the adequacy of outdoor air ventilation relative to indoor occupant density and metabolic activity.

Indoor CO2 levels above 500 ppm can lead to higher blood pressure and heart rate, and increased peripheral blood circulation.[85] With CO2 concentrations above 1000 ppm cognitive performance might be affected, especially when doing complex tasks, making decision making and problem solving slower but not less accurate.[86][87] However, evidence on the health effects of CO2 at lower concentrations is conflicting and it is difficult to link CO2 to health impacts at exposures below 5000 ppm – reported health outcomes may be due to the presence of human bioeffluents, and other indoor air pollutants related to inadequate ventilation.[88]

Indoor carbon dioxide concentrations can be used to evaluate the quality of a room or a building's ventilation.[89] To eliminate most complaints caused by CO2, the total indoor CO2 level should be reduced to a difference of no greater than 700 ppm above outdoor levels.[90] The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) considers that indoor air concentrations of carbon dioxide that exceed 1000 ppm are a marker suggesting inadequate ventilation.[91] The UK standards for schools say that carbon dioxide levels of 800 ppm or lower indicate that the room is well-ventilated.[92] Regulations and standards from around the world show that CO2 levels below 1000 ppm represent good IAQ, between 1000 and 1500 ppm represent moderate IAQ and greater than 1500 ppm represent poor IAQ.[88]

Carbon dioxide concentrations in closed or confined rooms can increase to 1,000 ppm within 45 minutes of enclosure. For example, in a 3.5-by-4-metre (11 ft × 13 ft) sized office, atmospheric carbon dioxide increased from 500 ppm to over 1,000 ppm within 45 minutes of ventilation cessation and closure of windows and doors.[93]

Radon

[edit]

Radon is an invisible, radioactive atomic gas that results from the radioactive decay of radium, which may be found in rock formations beneath buildings or in certain building materials themselves.

Radon is probably the most pervasive serious hazard for indoor air in the United States and Europe. It is a major cause of lung cancer, responsible for 3–14% of cases in countries, leading to tens of thousands of deaths.[94]

Radon gas enters buildings as a soil gas. As it is a heavy gas it will tend to accumulate at the lowest level. Radon may also be introduced into a building through drinking water particularly from bathroom showers. Building materials can be a rare source of radon, but little testing is carried out for stone, rock or tile products brought into building sites; radon accumulation is greatest for well insulated homes.[95] There are simple do-it-yourself kits for radon gas testing, but a licensed professional can also check homes.

The half-life for radon is 3.8 days, indicating that once the source is removed, the hazard will be greatly reduced within a few weeks. Radon mitigation methods include sealing concrete slab floors, basement foundations, water drainage systems, or by increasing ventilation.[96] They are usually cost effective and can greatly reduce or even eliminate the contamination and the associated health risks.[citation needed]

Radon is measured in picocuries per liter of air (pCi/L) or becquerel per cubic meter (Bq m-3). Both are measurements of radioactivity. The World Health Organization (WHO) sets the ideal indoor radon levels at 100 Bq/m-3.[97] In the United States, it is recommend to fix homes with radon levels at or above 4 pCi/L. At the same time it is also recommends that people think about fixing their homes for radon levels between 2 pCi/L and 4 pCi/L.[98] In the United Kingdom the ideal is presence of radon indoors is 100 Bq/m-3. Action needs to be taken in homes with 200 Bq/m−3 or more.[99]

Interactive maps of radon affected areas are available for various regions and countries of the world.[100][101][102]

IAQ and climate change

[edit]

Indoor air quality is linked inextricably to outdoor air quality. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has varying scenarios that predict how the climate will change in the future.[103] Climate change can affect indoor air quality by increasing the level of outdoor air pollutants such as ozone and particulate matter, for example through emissions from wildfires caused by extreme heat and drought.[104][105] Numerous predictions for how indoor air pollutants will change have been made,[106][107][108][109] and models have attempted to predict how the forecasted IPCC scenarios will vary indoor air quality and indoor comfort parameters such as humidity and temperature.[110]

The net-zero challenge requires significant changes in the performance of both new and retrofitted buildings. However, increased energy efficient housing will trap pollutants inside, whether produced indoors or outdoors, and lead to an increase in human exposure.[111][112]

Indoor air quality standards and monitoring

[edit]

Quality guidelines and standards

[edit]

For occupational exposure, there are standards, which cover a wide range of chemicals, and applied to healthy adults who are exposed over time at workplaces (usually industrial environments).These are published by organisations such as Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), the UK Health and Safety Executive (HSE).

There is no consensus globally about indoor air quality standards, or health-based guidelines. However, there are regulations from some individual countries and from health organisations. For example, the World Health Organization (WHO) has published health-based global air quality guidelines for the general population that are applicable both to outdoor and indoor air,[29] as well as the WHO IAQ guidelines for selected compounds,[113] whereas the UK Health Security Agency published IAQ guidelines for selected VOCs.[114] The Scientific and Technical Committee (STC34) of the International Society of Indoor Air Quality and Climate (ISIAQ) created an open database that collects indoor environmental quality guidelines worldwide.[115] The database is focused on indoor air quality (IAQ), but is currently extended to include standards, regulations, and guidelines related to ventilation, comfort, acoustics, and lighting.[116][117]

Real-time monitoring

[edit]

Since indoor air pollutants can adversely affect human health, it is important to have real-time indoor air quality assessment/monitoring system that can help not only in the improvement of indoor air quality but also help in detection of leaks, spills in a work environment and boost energy efficiency of buildings by providing real-time feedback to the heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) system(s).[118] Additionally, there have been enough studies that highlight the correlation between poor indoor air quality and loss of performance and productivity of workers in an office setting.[119]  

Combining the Internet of Things (IoT) technology with real-time IAQ monitoring systems has  tremendously gained momentum and popularity as interventions can be done based on the real-time sensor data and thus help in the IAQ improvement.[120]   

Improvement measures

[edit]

Indoor air quality can be addressed, achieved or maintained during the design of new buildings or as mitigating measures in existing buildings. A hierarchy of measures has been proposed by the Institute of Air Quality Management. It emphasises removing pollutant sources, reducing emissions from any remaining sources, disrupting pathways between sources and the people exposed, protecting people from exposure to pollutants, and removing people from areas with poor air quality.[121]

A report assisted by the Institute for Occupational Safety and Health of the German Social Accident Insurance can support in the systematic investigation of individual health problems arising at indoor workplaces, and in the identification of practical solutions.[122]

Source control

[edit]

HVAC design

[edit]

Environmentally sustainable design concepts include aspects of commercial and residential heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) technologies. Among several considerations, one of the topics attended to is the issue of indoor air quality throughout the design and construction stages of a building's life.[citation needed]

One technique to reduce energy consumption while maintaining adequate air quality, is demand-controlled ventilation. Instead of setting throughput at a fixed air replacement rate, carbon dioxide sensors are used to control the rate dynamically, based on the emissions of actual building occupants.[citation needed]

One way of quantitatively ensuring the health of indoor air is by the frequency of effective turnover of interior air by replacement with outside air. In the UK, for example, classrooms are required to have 2.5 outdoor air changes per hour. In halls, gym, dining, and physiotherapy spaces, the ventilation should be sufficient to limit carbon dioxide to 1,500 ppm. In the US, ventilation in classrooms is based on the amount of outdoor air per occupant plus the amount of outdoor air per unit of floor area, not air changes per hour. Since carbon dioxide indoors comes from occupants and outdoor air, the adequacy of ventilation per occupant is indicated by the concentration indoors minus the concentration outdoors. The value of 615 ppm above the outdoor concentration indicates approximately 15 cubic feet per minute of outdoor air per adult occupant doing sedentary office work where outdoor air contains over 400 ppm[123] (global average as of 2023). In classrooms, the requirements in the ASHRAE standard 62.1, Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality, would typically result in about 3 air changes per hour, depending on the occupant density. As the occupants are not the only source of pollutants, outdoor air ventilation may need to be higher when unusual or strong sources of pollution exist indoors.

When outdoor air is polluted, bringing in more outdoor air can actually worsen the overall quality of the indoor air and exacerbate some occupant symptoms related to outdoor air pollution. Generally, outdoor country air is better than indoor city air.[citation needed]

The use of air filters can trap some of the air pollutants. Portable room air cleaners with HEPA filters can be used if ventilation is poor or outside air has high level of PM 2.5.[122] Air filters are used to reduce the amount of dust that reaches the wet coils.[citation needed] Dust can serve as food to grow molds on the wet coils and ducts and can reduce the efficiency of the coils.[citation needed]

The use of trickle vents on windows is also valuable to maintain constant ventilation. They can help prevent mold and allergen build up in the home or workplace. They can also reduce the spread of some respiratory infections.[124]

Moisture management and humidity control requires operating HVAC systems as designed. Moisture management and humidity control may conflict with efforts to conserve energy. For example, moisture management and humidity control requires systems to be set to supply make-up air at lower temperatures (design levels), instead of the higher temperatures sometimes used to conserve energy in cooling-dominated climate conditions. However, for most of the US and many parts of Europe and Japan, during the majority of hours of the year, outdoor air temperatures are cool enough that the air does not need further cooling to provide thermal comfort indoors.[citation needed] However, high humidity outdoors creates the need for careful attention to humidity levels indoors. High humidity give rise to mold growth and moisture indoors is associated with a higher prevalence of occupant respiratory problems.[citation needed]

The "dew point temperature" is an absolute measure of the moisture in air. Some facilities are being designed with dew points in the lower 50s °F, and some in the upper and lower 40s °F.[citation needed] Some facilities are being designed using desiccant wheels with gas-fired heaters to dry out the wheel enough to get the required dew points.[citation needed] On those systems, after the moisture is removed from the make-up air, a cooling coil is used to lower the temperature to the desired level.[citation needed]

Commercial buildings, and sometimes residential, are often kept under slightly positive air pressure relative to the outdoors to reduce infiltration. Limiting infiltration helps with moisture management and humidity control.

Dilution of indoor pollutants with outdoor air is effective to the extent that outdoor air is free of harmful pollutants. Ozone in outdoor air occurs indoors at reduced concentrations because ozone is highly reactive with many chemicals found indoors. The products of the reactions between ozone and many common indoor pollutants include organic compounds that may be more odorous, irritating, or toxic than those from which they are formed. These products of ozone chemistry include formaldehyde, higher molecular weight aldehydes, acidic aerosols, and fine and ultrafine particles, among others. The higher the outdoor ventilation rate, the higher the indoor ozone concentration and the more likely the reactions will occur, but even at low levels, the reactions will take place. This suggests that ozone should be removed from ventilation air, especially in areas where outdoor ozone levels are frequently high.

Effect of indoor plants

[edit]
Spider plants (Chlorophytum comosum) absorb some airborne contaminants.

Houseplants together with the medium in which they are grown can reduce components of indoor air pollution, particularly volatile organic compounds (VOC) such as benzene, toluene, and xylene. Plants remove CO2 and release oxygen and water, although the quantitative impact for house plants is small. The interest in using potted plants for removing VOCs was sparked by a 1989 NASA study conducted in sealed chambers designed to replicate the environment on space stations. However, these results suffered from poor replication[125] and are not applicable to typical buildings, where outdoor-to-indoor air exchange already removes VOCs at a rate that could only be matched by the placement of 10–1000 plants/m2 of a building's floor space.[126]

Plants also appear to reduce airborne microbes and molds, and to increase humidity.[127] However, the increased humidity can itself lead to increased levels of mold and even VOCs.[128]

Since extremely high humidity is associated with increased mold growth, allergic responses, and respiratory responses, the presence of additional moisture from houseplants may not be desirable in all indoor settings if watering is done inappropriately.[129]

Institutional programs

[edit]
EPA graphic about asthma triggers

The topic of IAQ has become popular due to the greater awareness of health problems caused by mold and triggers to asthma and allergies.

In the US, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has developed an "IAQ Tools for Schools" program to help improve the indoor environmental conditions in educational institutions. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health conducts Health Hazard Evaluations (HHEs) in workplaces at the request of employees, authorized representative of employees, or employers, to determine whether any substance normally found in the place of employment has potentially toxic effects, including indoor air quality.[130]

A variety of scientists work in the field of indoor air quality, including chemists, physicists, mechanical engineers, biologists, bacteriologists, epidemiologists, and computer scientists. Some of these professionals are certified by organizations such as the American Industrial Hygiene Association, the American Indoor Air Quality Council and the Indoor Environmental Air Quality Council.

In the UK, under the Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs, the Air Quality Expert Group considers current knowledge on indoor air quality and provides advice to government and devolved administration ministers.[131]

At the international level, the International Society of Indoor Air Quality and Climate (ISIAQ), formed in 1991, organizes two major conferences, the Indoor Air and the Healthy Buildings series.[132]

See also

[edit]
  • Environmental management
  • Healthy building
  • Indoor bioaerosol
  • Microbiomes of the built environment
  • Olfactory fatigue

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Carroll, GT; Kirschman, DL; Mammana, A (2022). "Increased CO2 levels in the operating room correlate with the number of healthcare workers present: an imperative for intentional crowd control". Patient Safety in Surgery. 16 (35): 35. doi:10.1186/s13037-022-00343-8. PMC 9672642. PMID 36397098.
  2. ^ ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 62.1, Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality, ASHRAE, Inc., Atlanta, GA, US
  3. ^ Belias, Evangelos; Licina, Dusan (2022). "Outdoor PM2. 5 air filtration: optimising indoor air quality and energy". Building & Cities. 3 (1): 186–203. doi:10.5334/bc.153.
  4. ^ KMC Controls (September 24, 2015). "What's Your IQ on IAQ and IEQ?". Archived from the original on April 12, 2021. Retrieved April 12, 2021.[unreliable source?]
  5. ^ Bruce, N; Perez-Padilla, R; Albalak, R (2000). "Indoor air pollution in developing countries: a major environmental and public health challenge". Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 78 (9): 1078–92. PMC 2560841. PMID 11019457.
  6. ^ "Household air pollution and health: fact sheet". WHO. May 8, 2018. Archived from the original on November 12, 2021. Retrieved November 21, 2020.
  7. ^ Ritchie, Hannah; Roser, Max (2019). "Access to Energy". Our World in Data. Archived from the original on November 1, 2021. Retrieved April 1, 2021. According to the Global Burden of Disease study 1.6 million people died prematurely in 2017 as a result of indoor air pollution ... But it's worth noting that the WHO publishes a substantially larger number of indoor air pollution deaths..
  8. ^ Klepeis, Neil E; Nelson, William C; Ott, Wayne R; Robinson, John P; Tsang, Andy M; Switzer, Paul; Behar, Joseph V; Hern, Stephen C; Engelmann, William H (July 2001). "The National Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS): a resource for assessing exposure to environmental pollutants". Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology. 11 (3): 231–252. Bibcode:2001JESEE..11..231K. doi:10.1038/sj.jea.7500165. PMID 11477521. S2CID 22445147. Archived from the original on March 28, 2023. Retrieved March 30, 2024.
  9. ^ U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Office equipment: design, indoor air emissions, and pollution prevention opportunities. Air and Energy Engineering Research Laboratory, Research Triangle Park, 1995.
  10. ^ U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Unfinished business: a comparative assessment of environmental problems, EPA-230/2-87-025a-e (NTIS PB88-127030). Office of Policy, Planning and Evaluation, Washington, DC, 1987.
  11. ^ Klepeis, Neil E; Nelson, William C; Ott, Wayne R; Robinson, John P; Tsang, Andy M; Switzer, Paul; Behar, Joseph V; Hern, Stephen C; Engelmann, William H (July 1, 2001). "The National Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS): a resource for assessing exposure to environmental pollutants". Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology. 11 (3): 231–252. Bibcode:2001JESEE..11..231K. doi:10.1038/sj.jea.7500165. ISSN 1559-0631. PMID 11477521. Archived from the original on November 13, 2023. Retrieved November 13, 2023.
  12. ^ "Combined or multiple exposure to health stressors in indoor built environments: an evidence-based review prepared for the WHO training workshop "Multiple environmental exposures and risks": 16–18 October 2013, Bonn, Germany". World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe. 2014. Archived from the original on November 6, 2023. Retrieved April 10, 2024.
  13. ^ "Household air pollution". World Health Organization. December 15, 2023. Archived from the original on November 12, 2021. Retrieved April 10, 2024.
  14. ^ Clark, Sierra N.; Lam, Holly C. Y.; Goode, Emma-Jane; Marczylo, Emma L.; Exley, Karen S.; Dimitroulopoulou, Sani (August 2, 2023). "The Burden of Respiratory Disease from Formaldehyde, Damp and Mould in English Housing". Environments. 10 (8): 136. doi:10.3390/environments10080136. ISSN 2076-3298.
  15. ^ "Chief Medical Officer (CMO): annual reports". GOV.UK. November 16, 2023. Retrieved May 5, 2024.
  16. ^ "Project information | Indoor air quality at home | Quality standards | NICE". www.nice.org.uk. Retrieved May 5, 2024.
  17. ^ "The inside story: Health effects of indoor air quality on children and young people". RCPCH. Retrieved May 5, 2024.
  18. ^ Halios, Christos H.; Landeg-Cox, Charlotte; Lowther, Scott D.; Middleton, Alice; Marczylo, Tim; Dimitroulopoulou, Sani (September 15, 2022). "Chemicals in European residences – Part I: A review of emissions, concentrations and health effects of volatile organic compounds (VOCs)". Science of the Total Environment. 839: 156201. Bibcode:2022ScTEn.83956201H. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156201. ISSN 0048-9697. PMID 35623519.
  19. ^ "Literature review on chemical pollutants in indoor air in public settings for children and overview of their health effects with a focus on schools, kindergartens and day-care centres". www.who.int. Retrieved May 5, 2024.
  20. ^ Burge, P S (February 2004). "Sick building syndrome". Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 61 (2): 185–190. doi:10.1136/oem.2003.008813. PMC 1740708. PMID 14739390.
  21. ^ Apte, K; Salvi, S (2016). "Household air pollution and its effects on health". F1000Research. 5: 2593. doi:10.12688/f1000research.7552.1. PMC 5089137. PMID 27853506. Burning of natural gas not only produces a variety of gases such as sulfur oxides, mercury compounds, and particulate matter but also leads to the production of nitrogen oxides, primarily nitrogen dioxide...The burning of biomass fuel or any other fossil fuel increases the concentration of black carbon in the air
  22. ^ "Improved Clean Cookstoves". Project Drawdown. February 7, 2020. Archived from the original on December 15, 2021. Retrieved December 5, 2020.
  23. ^ WHO indoor air quality guidelines: household fuel combustion. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2014. ISBN 978-92-4-154888-5.
  24. ^ "Clearing the Air: Gas Cooking and Pollution in European Homes". CLASP. November 8, 2023. Retrieved May 5, 2024.
  25. ^ Seals, Brady; Krasner, Andee. "Gas Stoves: Health and Air Quality Impacts and Solutions". RMI. Retrieved May 5, 2024.
  26. ^ a b c Myers, Isabella (February 2022). The efficient operation of regulation and legislation: An holistic approach to understanding the effect of Carbon Monoxide on mortality (PDF). CO Research Trust.
  27. ^ a b c Penney, David; Benignus, Vernon; Kephalopoulos, Stylianos; Kotzias, Dimitrios; Kleinman, Michael; Verrier, Agnes (2010), "Carbon monoxide", WHO Guidelines for Indoor Air Quality: Selected Pollutants, World Health Organization, ISBN 978-92-890-0213-4, OCLC 696099951, archived from the original on March 8, 2021, retrieved March 18, 2024
  28. ^ "Carbon monoxide: toxicological overview". UK Health Security Agency. May 24, 2022. Retrieved April 17, 2024.
  29. ^ a b c WHO global air quality guidelines: particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), ozone, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide and carbon monoxide (PDF). World Health Organization. 2021. hdl:10665/345329. ISBN 978-92-4-003422-8.[page needed]
  30. ^ a b Soleimani, Farshid; Dobaradaran, Sina; De-la-Torre, Gabriel E.; Schmidt, Torsten C.; Saeedi, Reza (March 2022). "Content of toxic components of cigarette, cigarette smoke vs cigarette butts: A comprehensive systematic review". Science of the Total Environment. 813: 152667. Bibcode:2022ScTEn.81352667S. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152667. PMID 34963586.
  31. ^ "Considering smoking as an air pollution problem for environmental health | Environmental Performance Index". Archived from the original on September 25, 2018. Retrieved March 21, 2018.
  32. ^ Arfaeinia, Hossein; Ghaemi, Maryam; Jahantigh, Anis; Soleimani, Farshid; Hashemi, Hassan (June 12, 2023). "Secondhand and thirdhand smoke: a review on chemical contents, exposure routes, and protective strategies". Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 30 (32): 78017–78029. Bibcode:2023ESPR...3078017A. doi:10.1007/s11356-023-28128-1. PMC 10258487. PMID 37306877.
  33. ^ Arfaeinia, Hossein; Ghaemi, Maryam; Jahantigh, Anis; Soleimani, Farshid; Hashemi, Hassan (June 12, 2023). "Secondhand and thirdhand smoke: a review on chemical contents, exposure routes, and protective strategies". Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 30 (32): 78017–78029. Bibcode:2023ESPR...3078017A. doi:10.1007/s11356-023-28128-1. ISSN 1614-7499. PMC 10258487. PMID 37306877.
  34. ^ Health, CDC's Office on Smoking and (May 9, 2018). "Smoking and Tobacco Use; Fact Sheet; Secondhand Smoke". Smoking and Tobacco Use. Archived from the original on December 15, 2021. Retrieved January 14, 2019.
  35. ^ Fernández, E; Ballbè, M; Sureda, X; Fu, M; Saltó, E; Martínez-Sánchez, JM (December 2015). "Particulate Matter from Electronic Cigarettes and Conventional Cigarettes: a Systematic Review and Observational Study". Current Environmental Health Reports. 2 (4): 423–9. Bibcode:2015CEHR....2..423F. doi:10.1007/s40572-015-0072-x. PMID 26452675.
  36. ^ Vu, Tuan V.; Harrison, Roy M. (May 8, 2019). "Chemical and Physical Properties of Indoor Aerosols". In Harrison, R. M.; Hester, R. E. (eds.). Indoor Air Pollution. The Royal Society of Chemistry (published 2019). ISBN 978-1-78801-803-6.
  37. ^ Abdullahi, Karimatu L.; Delgado-Saborit, Juana Maria; Harrison, Roy M. (February 13, 2013). "Emissions and indoor concentrations of particulate matter and its specific chemical components from cooking: A review". Atmospheric Environment. 71: 260–294. Bibcode:2013AtmEn..71..260A. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.01.061. Archived from the original on May 21, 2023. Retrieved April 11, 2024.
  38. ^ Patel, Sameer; Sankhyan, Sumit; Boedicker, Erin K.; DeCarlo, Peter F.; Farmer, Delphine K.; Goldstein, Allen H.; Katz, Erin F.; Nazaroff, William W; Tian, Yilin; Vanhanen, Joonas; Vance, Marina E. (June 16, 2020). "Indoor Particulate Matter during HOMEChem: Concentrations, Size Distributions, and Exposures". Environmental Science & Technology. 54 (12): 7107–7116. Bibcode:2020EnST...54.7107P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.0c00740. ISSN 0013-936X. PMID 32391692. Archived from the original on April 28, 2023. Retrieved April 11, 2024.
  39. ^ Thangavel, Prakash; Park, Duckshin; Lee, Young-Chul (June 19, 2022). "Recent Insights into Particulate Matter (PM2.5)-Mediated Toxicity in Humans: An Overview". International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 19 (12): 7511. doi:10.3390/ijerph19127511. ISSN 1660-4601. PMC 9223652. PMID 35742761.
  40. ^ You, Bo; Zhou, Wei; Li, Junyao; Li, Zhijie; Sun, Yele (November 4, 2022). "A review of indoor Gaseous organic compounds and human chemical Exposure: Insights from Real-time measurements". Environment International. 170: 107611. Bibcode:2022EnInt.17007611Y. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2022.107611. PMID 36335895.
  41. ^ Weschler, Charles J.; Carslaw, Nicola (March 6, 2018). "Indoor Chemistry". Environmental Science & Technology. 52 (5): 2419–2428. Bibcode:2018EnST...52.2419W. doi:10.1021/acs.est.7b06387. ISSN 0013-936X. PMID 29402076. Archived from the original on November 15, 2023. Retrieved April 11, 2024.
  42. ^ a b Carter, Toby J.; Poppendieck, Dustin G.; Shaw, David; Carslaw, Nicola (January 16, 2023). "A Modelling Study of Indoor Air Chemistry: The Surface Interactions of Ozone and Hydrogen Peroxide". Atmospheric Environment. 297: 119598. Bibcode:2023AtmEn.29719598C. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119598.
  43. ^ Tsai, Wen-Tien (March 26, 2019). "An overview of health hazards of volatile organic compounds regulated as indoor air pollutants". Reviews on Environmental Health. 34 (1): 81–89. doi:10.1515/reveh-2018-0046. PMID 30854833.
  44. ^ "U.S. EPA IAQ – Organic chemicals". Epa.gov. August 5, 2010. Archived from the original on September 9, 2015. Retrieved March 2, 2012.
  45. ^ a b Davies, Helen L.; O'Leary, Catherine; Dillon, Terry; Shaw, David R.; Shaw, Marvin; Mehra, Archit; Phillips, Gavin; Carslaw, Nicola (August 14, 2023). "A measurement and modelling investigation of the indoor air chemistry following cooking activities". Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts. 25 (9): 1532–1548. doi:10.1039/D3EM00167A. ISSN 2050-7887. PMID 37609942.
  46. ^ a b c Harding-Smith, Ellen; Shaw, David R.; Shaw, Marvin; Dillon, Terry J.; Carslaw, Nicola (January 23, 2024). "Does green mean clean? Volatile organic emissions from regular versus green cleaning products". Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts. 26 (2): 436–450. doi:10.1039/D3EM00439B. ISSN 2050-7887. PMID 38258874.
  47. ^ Lebel, Eric D.; Michanowicz, Drew R.; Bilsback, Kelsey R.; Hill, Lee Ann L.; Goldman, Jackson S. W.; Domen, Jeremy K.; Jaeger, Jessie M.; Ruiz, Angélica; Shonkoff, Seth B. C. (November 15, 2022). "Composition, Emissions, and Air Quality Impacts of Hazardous Air Pollutants in Unburned Natural Gas from Residential Stoves in California". Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (22): 15828–15838. Bibcode:2022EnST...5615828L. doi:10.1021/acs.est.2c02581. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 9671046. PMID 36263944.
  48. ^ "Volatile Organic Compounds' Impact on Indoor Air Quality". United States Environmental Protection Agency. August 18, 2014. Retrieved May 23, 2024.
  49. ^ "About VOCs". January 21, 2013. Archived from the original on January 21, 2013. Retrieved September 16, 2019.
  50. ^ Oanh, Nguyen Thi Kim; Hung, Yung-Tse (2005). "Indoor Air Pollution Control". Advanced Air and Noise Pollution Control. Handbook of Environmental Engineering. Vol. 2. pp. 237–272. doi:10.1007/978-1-59259-779-6_7. ISBN 978-1-58829-359-6.
  51. ^ "Emicode". Eurofins.com. Archived from the original on September 24, 2015. Retrieved March 2, 2012.
  52. ^ "M1". Eurofins.com. Archived from the original on September 24, 2015. Retrieved March 2, 2012.
  53. ^ "Blue Angel". Eurofins.com. Archived from the original on September 24, 2015. Retrieved March 2, 2012.
  54. ^ "Indoor Air Comfort". Indoor Air Comfort. Archived from the original on February 1, 2011. Retrieved March 2, 2012.
  55. ^ "CDPH Section 01350". Eurofins.com. Archived from the original on September 24, 2015. Retrieved March 2, 2012.
  56. ^ a b "Smelly Moldy Houses". Archived from the original on December 15, 2021. Retrieved August 2, 2014.
  57. ^ Meruva, N. K.; Penn, J. M.; Farthing, D. E. (November 2004). "Rapid identification of microbial VOCs from tobacco molds using closed-loop stripping and gas chromatography/time-of-flight mass spectrometry". J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 31 (10): 482–8. doi:10.1007/s10295-004-0175-0. PMID 15517467. S2CID 32543591.
  58. ^ "Atmospheric carbon dioxide passes 400 ppm everywhere". Physics Today (6): 8170. 2016. Bibcode:2016PhT..2016f8170.. doi:10.1063/pt.5.029904.
  59. ^ Xie Y, Li Y, Feng Y, Cheng W, Wang Y (April 2022). "Inhalable microplastics prevails in air: Exploring the size detection limit". Environ Int. 162: 107151. Bibcode:2022EnInt.16207151X. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2022.107151. PMID 35228011.
  60. ^ Liu C, Li J, Zhang Y, Wang L, Deng J, Gao Y, Yu L, Zhang J, Sun H (July 2019). "Widespread distribution of PET and PC microplastics in dust in urban China and their estimated human exposure". Environ Int. 128: 116–124. Bibcode:2019EnInt.128..116L. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2019.04.024. PMID 31039519.
  61. ^ Yuk, Hyeonseong; Jo, Ho Hyeon; Nam, Jihee; Kim, Young Uk; Kim, Sumin (2022). "Microplastic: A particulate matter(PM) generated by deterioration of building materials". Journal of Hazardous Materials. 437. Elsevier BV: 129290. Bibcode:2022JHzM..43729290Y. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129290. ISSN 0304-3894. PMID 35753297.
  62. ^ Eberhard, Tiffany; Casillas, Gaston; Zarus, Gregory M.; Barr, Dana Boyd (January 6, 2024). "Systematic review of microplastics and nanoplastics in indoor and outdoor air: identifying a framework and data needs for quantifying human inhalation exposures" (PDF). Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology. 34 (2). Springer Science and Business Media LLC: 185–196. doi:10.1038/s41370-023-00634-x. ISSN 1559-0631. Retrieved December 19, 2024. MPs have been found in water and soil, and recent research is exposing the vast amount of them in ambient and indoor air.
  63. ^ Gasperi, Johnny; Wright, Stephanie L.; Dris, Rachid; Collard, France; Mandin, Corinne; Guerrouache, Mohamed; Langlois, Valérie; Kelly, Frank J.; Tassin, Bruno (2018). "Microplastics in air: Are we breathing it in?" (PDF). Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health. 1: 1–5. Bibcode:2018COESH...1....1G. doi:10.1016/j.coesh.2017.10.002. S2CID 133750509. Archived (PDF) from the original on March 6, 2020. Retrieved July 11, 2019.
  64. ^ Prasittisopin, Lapyote; Ferdous, Wahid; Kamchoom, Viroon (2023). "Microplastics in construction and built environment". Developments in the Built Environment. 15. Elsevier BV. doi:10.1016/j.dibe.2023.100188. ISSN 2666-1659.
  65. ^ Galloway, Nanette LoBiondo (September 13, 2024). "Ventnor introduces ordinance to control microplastics contamination". DownBeach. Retrieved October 2, 2024.
  66. ^ Weschler, Charles J. (December 2000). "Ozone in Indoor Environments: Concentration and Chemistry: Ozone in Indoor Environments". Indoor Air. 10 (4): 269–288. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0668.2000.010004269.x. PMID 11089331. Archived from the original on April 15, 2024. Retrieved April 11, 2024.
  67. ^ Weschler, Charles J.; Nazaroff, William W (February 22, 2023). "Human skin oil: a major ozone reactant indoors". Environmental Science: Atmospheres. 3 (4): 640–661. doi:10.1039/D3EA00008G. ISSN 2634-3606. Archived from the original on April 15, 2024. Retrieved April 11, 2024.
  68. ^ Kumar, Prashant; Kalaiarasan, Gopinath; Porter, Alexandra E.; Pinna, Alessandra; KÅ‚osowski, MichaÅ‚ M.; Demokritou, Philip; Chung, Kian Fan; Pain, Christopher; Arvind, D. K.; Arcucci, Rossella; Adcock, Ian M.; Dilliway, Claire (February 20, 2021). "An overview of methods of fine and ultrafine particle collection for physicochemical characterisation and toxicity assessments". Science of the Total Environment. 756: 143553. Bibcode:2021ScTEn.75643553K. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143553. hdl:10044/1/84518. PMID 33239200. S2CID 227176222.
  69. ^ Apte, M. G.; Buchanan, I. S. H.; Mendell, M. J. (April 2008). "Outdoor ozone and building-related symptoms in the BASE study". Indoor Air. 18 (2): 156–170. Bibcode:2008InAir..18..156A. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0668.2008.00521.x. PMID 18333994.
  70. ^ "Eight-hour Average Ozone Concentrations | Ground-level Ozone | New England | US EPA". United States Environmental Protection Agency. Archived from the original on December 15, 2021. Retrieved September 16, 2019.
  71. ^ a b c Park, J. H.; Cox-Ganser, J. M. (2011). "Meta-Mold exposure and respiratory health in damp indoor environments". Frontiers in Bioscience. 3 (2): 757–771. doi:10.2741/e284. PMID 21196349.
  72. ^ "CDC – Mold – General Information – Facts About Mold and Dampness". December 4, 2018. Archived from the original on December 16, 2019. Retrieved June 23, 2017.
  73. ^ Singh, Dr Jagjit; Singh, Jagjit, eds. (1994). Building Mycology (1 ed.). Taylor & Francis. doi:10.4324/9780203974735. ISBN 978-1-135-82462-4.
  74. ^ a b Clarke, J.A; Johnstone, C.M; Kelly, N.J; McLean, R.C; anderson, J.A; Rowan, N.J; Smith, J.E (January 20, 1999). "A technique for the prediction of the conditions leading to mould growth in buildings". Building and Environment. 34 (4): 515–521. Bibcode:1999BuEnv..34..515C. doi:10.1016/S0360-1323(98)00023-7. Archived from the original on October 26, 2022. Retrieved April 10, 2024.
  75. ^ Vereecken, Evy; Roels, Staf (November 15, 2011). "Review of mould prediction models and their influence on mould risk evaluation". Building and Environment. 51: 296–310. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.11.003. Archived from the original on March 2, 2024. Retrieved April 11, 2024.
  76. ^ BS 5250:2021 - Management of moisture in buildings. Code of practice. British Standards Institution (BSI). October 31, 2021. ISBN 978-0-539-18975-9.
  77. ^ Madgwick, Della; Wood, Hannah (August 8, 2016). "The problem of clothes drying in new homes in the UK". Structural Survey. 34 (4/5): 320–330. doi:10.1108/SS-10-2015-0048. ISSN 0263-080X. Archived from the original on May 7, 2021. Retrieved April 11, 2024.
  78. ^ May, Neil; McGilligan, Charles; Ucci, Marcella (2017). "Health and Moisture in Buildings" (PDF). UK Centre for Moisture in Buildings. Archived (PDF) from the original on April 11, 2024. Retrieved April 11, 2024.
  79. ^ "Understanding and addressing the health risks of damp and mould in the home". GOV.UK. September 7, 2023. Archived from the original on April 10, 2024. Retrieved April 11, 2024.
  80. ^ Clark, Sierra N.; Lam, Holly C. Y.; Goode, Emma-Jane; Marczylo, Emma L.; Exley, Karen S.; Dimitroulopoulou, Sani (August 2, 2023). "The Burden of Respiratory Disease from Formaldehyde, Damp and Mould in English Housing". Environments. 10 (8): 136. doi:10.3390/environments10080136. ISSN 2076-3298.
  81. ^ Microbiology of the Indoor Environment Archived July 23, 2011, at the Wayback Machine, microbe.net
  82. ^ http://www.info.gov.hk/info/sars/pdf/amoy_e.pdf
  83. ^ https://www.info.gov.hk/info/sars/graphics/amoyannex.jpg
  84. ^ "Progress in Global Surveillance and Response Capacity 10 Years after Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome". environmental contamination with SARS CoV RNA was identified on the carpet in front of the index case-patient's room and 3 nearby rooms (and on their door frames but not inside the rooms) and in the air intake vents near the centrally located elevators ... secondary infections occurred not in guest rooms but in the common areas of the ninth floor, such as the corridor or elevator hall. These areas could have been contaminated through body fluids (e.g., vomitus, expectorated sputum), respiratory droplets, or suspended small-particle aerosols generated by the index case-patient; other guests were then infected by fomites or aerosols while passing through these same areas. Efficient spread of SARS CoV through small-particle aerosols was observed in several superspreading events in health care settings, during an airplane flight, and in an apartment complex (12–14,16–19). This process of environmental contamination that generated infectious aerosols likely best explains the pattern of disease transmission at the Hotel Metropole.
  85. ^ Azuma, Kenichi; Kagi, Naoki; Yanagi, U.; Osawa, Haruki (December 2018). "Effects of low-level inhalation exposure to carbon dioxide in indoor environments: A short review on human health and psychomotor performance". Environment International. 121 (Pt 1): 51–56. Bibcode:2018EnInt.121...51A. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2018.08.059. PMID 30172928.
  86. ^ Du, Bowen; Tandoc, Michael (June 19, 2020). "Indoor CO2 concentrations and cognitive function: A critical review". International Journal of Indoor Environment and Health. 30 (6): 1067–1082. Bibcode:2020InAir..30.1067D. doi:10.1111/ina.12706. PMID 32557862. S2CID 219915861.
  87. ^ Fan, Yuejie; Cao, Xiaodong; Zhang, Jie; Lai, Dayi; Pang, Liping (June 1, 2023). "Short-term exposure to indoor carbon dioxide and cognitive task performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis". Building and Environment. 237: 110331. Bibcode:2023BuEnv.23710331F. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110331.
  88. ^ a b Lowther, Scott D.; Dimitroulopoulou, Sani; Foxall, Kerry; Shrubsole, Clive; Cheek, Emily; Gadeberg, Britta; Sepai, Ovnair (November 16, 2021). "Low Level Carbon Dioxide Indoors—A Pollution Indicator or a Pollutant? A Health-Based Perspective". Environments. 8 (11): 125. doi:10.3390/environments8110125. ISSN 2076-3298.
  89. ^ Persily, Andrew (July 2022). "Development and application of an indoor carbon dioxide metric". Indoor Air. 32 (7): e13059. doi:10.1111/ina.13059. PMID 35904382.
  90. ^ "Indoor Environmental Quality: HVAC Management | NIOSH | CDC". www.cdc.gov. February 25, 2022. Archived from the original on April 1, 2022. Retrieved April 1, 2022.
  91. ^ Indoor Environmental Quality: Building Ventilation Archived January 20, 2022, at the Wayback Machine. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Accessed October 8, 2008.
  92. ^ "SAMHE - Schools' Air quality Monitoring for Health and Education". samhe.org.uk. Archived from the original on March 18, 2024. Retrieved March 18, 2024.
  93. ^ "Document Display | NEPIS | US EPA". nepis.epa.gov. Archived from the original on November 16, 2023. Retrieved October 19, 2023.
  94. ^ Zeeb & Shannoun 2009, p. 3.
  95. ^ C.Michael Hogan and Sjaak Slanina. 2010, Air pollution. Encyclopedia of Earth Archived October 12, 2006, at the Wayback Machine. eds. Sidney Draggan and Cutler Cleveland. National Council for Science and the Environment. Washington DC
  96. ^ "Radon Mitigation Methods". Radon Solution—Raising Radon Awareness. Archived from the original on December 15, 2008. Retrieved December 2, 2008.
  97. ^ Zeeb & Shannoun 2009, p. [page needed].
  98. ^ "Basic radon facts" (PDF). US Environmental Protection Agency. Archived (PDF) from the original on January 13, 2022. Retrieved September 18, 2018. Public Domain This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  99. ^ "Radon Action Level and Target Level". UKradon. Archived from the original on March 18, 2024. Retrieved March 18, 2024.
  100. ^ "Radon Zone Map (with State Information)". U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Archived from the original on April 1, 2023. Retrieved April 10, 2024.
  101. ^ "UK maps of radon". UKradon. Archived from the original on March 7, 2024. Retrieved April 10, 2024.
  102. ^ "Radon map of Australia". Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA). Archived from the original on March 20, 2024. Retrieved April 10, 2024.
  103. ^ "Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis". Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Archived (PDF) from the original on May 26, 2023. Retrieved April 15, 2024.
  104. ^ Chen, Guochao; Qiu, Minghao; Wang, Peng; Zhang, Yuqiang; Shindell, Drew; Zhang, Hongliang (July 19, 2024). "Continuous wildfires threaten public and ecosystem health under climate change across continents". Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering. 18 (10). doi:10.1007/s11783-024-1890-6. ISSN 2095-2201.
  105. ^ Gherasim, Alina; Lee, Alison G.; Bernstein, Jonathan A. (November 14, 2023). "Impact of Climate Change on Indoor Air Quality". Immunology and Allergy Clinics of North America. 44 (1): 55–73. doi:10.1016/j.iac.2023.09.001. PMID 37973260. Archived from the original on November 15, 2023. Retrieved April 15, 2024.
  106. ^ Lacressonnière, Gwendoline; Watson, Laura; Gauss, Michael; Engardt, Magnuz; Andersson, Camilla; Beekmann, Matthias; Colette, Augustin; Foret, Gilles; Josse, Béatrice; Marécal, Virginie; Nyiri, Agnes; Siour, Guillaume; Sobolowski, Stefan; Vautard, Robert (February 1, 2017). "Particulate matter air pollution in Europe in a +2 °C warming world". Atmospheric Environment. 154: 129–140. Bibcode:2017AtmEn.154..129L. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.01.037. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved April 15, 2024.
  107. ^ Lee, J; Lewis, A; Monks, P; Jacob, M; Hamilton, J; Hopkins, J; Watson, N; Saxton, J; Ennis, C; Carpenter, L (September 26, 2006). "Ozone photochemistry and elevated isoprene during the UK heatwave of august 2003". Atmospheric Environment. 40 (39): 7598–7613. Bibcode:2006AtmEn..40.7598L. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.06.057. Archived from the original on October 26, 2022. Retrieved April 15, 2024.
  108. ^ Salthammer, Tunga; Schieweck, Alexandra; Gu, Jianwei; Ameri, Shaghayegh; Uhde, Erik (August 7, 2018). "Future trends in ambient air pollution and climate in Germany – Implications for the indoor environment". Building and Environment. 143: 661–670. Bibcode:2018BuEnv.143..661S. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.07.050.
  109. ^ Zhong, L.; Lee, C.-S.; Haghighat, F. (December 1, 2016). "Indoor ozone and climate change". Sustainable Cities and Society. 28: 466–472. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2016.08.020. Archived from the original on November 28, 2022. Retrieved April 15, 2024.
  110. ^ Zhao, Jiangyue; Uhde, Erik; Salthammer, Tunga; Antretter, Florian; Shaw, David; Carslaw, Nicola; Schieweck, Alexandra (December 9, 2023). "Long-term prediction of the effects of climate change on indoor climate and air quality". Environmental Research. 243: 117804. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2023.117804. PMID 38042519.
  111. ^ Niculita-Hirzel, Hélène (March 16, 2022). "Latest Trends in Pollutant Accumulations at Threatening Levels in Energy-Efficient Residential Buildings with and without Mechanical Ventilation: A Review". International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 19 (6): 3538. doi:10.3390/ijerph19063538. ISSN 1660-4601. PMC 8951331. PMID 35329223.
  112. ^ UK Health Security Agency (2024) [1 September 2012]. "Chapter 5: Impact of climate change policies on indoor environmental quality and health in UK housing". Health Effects of Climate Change (HECC) in the UK: 2023 report (published January 15, 2024).
  113. ^ World Health Organization, ed. (2010). Who guidelines for indoor air quality: selected pollutants. Copenhagen: WHO. ISBN 978-92-890-0213-4. OCLC 696099951.
  114. ^ "Air quality: UK guidelines for volatile organic compounds in indoor spaces". Public Health England. September 13, 2019. Retrieved April 17, 2024.
  115. ^ "Home - IEQ Guidelines". ieqguidelines.org. Retrieved April 17, 2024.
  116. ^ Toyinbo, Oluyemi; Hägerhed, Linda; Dimitroulopoulou, Sani; Dudzinska, Marzenna; Emmerich, Steven; Hemming, David; Park, Ju-Hyeong; Haverinen-Shaughnessy, Ulla; the Scientific Technical Committee 34 of the International Society of Indoor Air Quality, Climate (April 19, 2022). "Open database for international and national indoor environmental quality guidelines". Indoor Air. 32 (4): e13028. doi:10.1111/ina.13028. ISSN 0905-6947. PMC 11099937. PMID 35481936.cite journal: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  117. ^ Dimitroulopoulou, Sani; DudziÅ„ska, Marzenna R.; Gunnarsen, Lars; Hägerhed, Linda; Maula, Henna; Singh, Raja; Toyinbo, Oluyemi; Haverinen-Shaughnessy, Ulla (August 4, 2023). "Indoor air quality guidelines from across the world: An appraisal considering energy saving, health, productivity, and comfort". Environment International. 178: 108127. Bibcode:2023EnInt.17808127D. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2023.108127. PMID 37544267.
  118. ^ Pitarma, Rui; Marques, Gonçalo; Ferreira, Bárbara Roque (February 2017). "Monitoring Indoor Air Quality for Enhanced Occupational Health". Journal of Medical Systems. 41 (2): 23. doi:10.1007/s10916-016-0667-2. PMID 28000117. S2CID 7372403.
  119. ^ Wyon, D. P. (August 2004). "The effects of indoor air quality on performance and productivity: The effects of IAQ on performance and productivity". Indoor Air. 14: 92–101. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0668.2004.00278.x. PMID 15330777.
  120. ^ Son, Young Joo; Pope, Zachary C.; Pantelic, Jovan (September 2023). "Perceived air quality and satisfaction during implementation of an automated indoor air quality monitoring and control system". Building and Environment. 243: 110713. Bibcode:2023BuEnv.24310713S. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110713.
  121. ^ IAQM (2021). Indoor Air Quality Guidance: Assessment, Monitoring, Modelling and Mitigation (PDF) (Version 0.1 ed.). London: Institute of Air Quality Management.
  122. ^ a b Institute for Occupational Safety and Health of the German Social Accident Insurance. "Indoor workplaces – Recommended procedure for the investigation of working environment". Archived from the original on November 3, 2021. Retrieved June 10, 2020.
  123. ^ "Climate Change: Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide | NOAA Climate.gov". www.climate.gov. April 9, 2024. Retrieved May 6, 2024.
  124. ^ "Ventilation to reduce the spread of respiratory infections, including COVID-19". GOV.UK. August 2, 2022. Archived from the original on January 18, 2024. Retrieved April 15, 2024.
  125. ^ Dela Cruz, Majbrit; Christensen, Jan H.; Thomsen, Jane Dyrhauge; Müller, Renate (December 2014). "Can ornamental potted plants remove volatile organic compounds from indoor air? — a review". Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 21 (24): 13909–13928. Bibcode:2014ESPR...2113909D. doi:10.1007/s11356-014-3240-x. PMID 25056742. S2CID 207272189.
  126. ^ Cummings, Bryan E.; Waring, Michael S. (March 2020). "Potted plants do not improve indoor air quality: a review and analysis of reported VOC removal efficiencies". Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology. 30 (2): 253–261. Bibcode:2020JESEE..30..253C. doi:10.1038/s41370-019-0175-9. PMID 31695112. S2CID 207911697.
  127. ^ Wolverton, B. C.; Wolverton, J. D. (1996). "Interior plants: their influence on airborne microbes inside energy-efficient buildings". Journal of the Mississippi Academy of Sciences. 41 (2): 100–105.
  128. ^ US EPA, OAR (July 16, 2013). "Mold". US EPA. Archived from the original on May 18, 2020. Retrieved September 16, 2019.
  129. ^ Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Damp Indoor Spaces and Health (2004). Damp Indoor Spaces and Health. National Academies Press. ISBN 978-0-309-09193-0. PMID 25009878. Archived from the original on January 19, 2023. Retrieved March 30, 2024.[page needed]
  130. ^ "Indoor Environmental Quality". Washington, DC: US National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Archived from the original on December 3, 2013. Retrieved May 17, 2013.
  131. ^ Lewis, Alastair C; Allan, James; Carslaw, David; Carruthers, David; Fuller, Gary; Harrison, Roy; Heal, Mathew; Nemitz, Eiko; Reeves, Claire (2022). Indoor Air Quality (PDF) (Report). Air Quality Expert Group. doi:10.5281/zenodo.6523605. Archived (PDF) from the original on June 5, 2023. Retrieved April 15, 2024.
  132. ^ "Isiaq.Org". International Society of Indoor Air Quality and Climate. Archived from the original on January 21, 2022. Retrieved March 2, 2012.

Sources

[edit]
Monographs
  • May, Jeffrey C.; Connie L. May; Ouellette, John J.; Reed, Charles E. (2004). The mold survival guide for your home and for your health. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN 978-0-8018-7938-8.
  • May, Jeffrey C. (2001). My house is killing me! : the home guide for families with allergies and asthma. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN 978-0-8018-6730-9.
  • May, Jeffrey C. (2006). My office is killing me! : the sick building survival guide. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN 978-0-8018-8342-2.
  • Salthammer, T., ed. (1999). Organic Indoor Air Pollutants — Occurrence, Measurement, Evaluation. Wiley-VCH. ISBN 978-3-527-29622-4.
  • Spengler, J.D.; Samet, J.M. (1991). Indoor air pollution: A health perspective. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN 978-0-8018-4125-5.
  • Samet, J.M.; McCarthy, J.F. (2001). Indoor Air Quality Handbook. NY: McGraw–Hill. ISBN 978-0-07-445549-4.
  • Tichenor, B. (1996). Characterizing Sources of Indoor Air Pollution and Related Sink Effects. ASTM STP 1287. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM. ISBN 978-0-8031-2030-3.
  • Zeeb, Hajo; Shannoun, Ferid, eds. (2009). WHO Handbook on Indoor Radon: A Public Health Perspective. World Health Organization. ISBN 978-92-4-154767-3. PMID 23762967. NBK143216. Archived from the original on March 30, 2024. Retrieved March 30, 2024.
Articles, radio segments, web pages
  • Apte, M. G.; Buchanan, I. S. H.; Mendell, M. J. (April 2008). "Outdoor ozone and building-related symptoms in the BASE study". Indoor Air. 18 (2): 156–170. Bibcode:2008InAir..18..156A. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0668.2008.00521.x. PMID 18333994.
  • Bad In-Flight Air Exacerbated by Passengers Archived December 15, 2021, at the Wayback Machine, Talk of the Nation, National Public Radio, September 21, 2007.
  • Indoor Air Pollution index page, United States Environmental Protection Agency.
  • Steinemann, Anne (2017). "Ten questions concerning air fresheners and indoor built environments". Building and Environment. 111: 279–284. Bibcode:2017BuEnv.111..279S. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.11.009. hdl:11343/121890.

Further reading

[edit]
  • Lin, Y.; Zou, J.; Yang, W.; Li, C. Q. (2018). "A Review of Recent Advances in Research on PM2.5 in China". International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 15 (3): 438. doi:10.3390/ijerph15030438. PMC 5876983. PMID 29498704.
  • Abdel Hameed, A. A.; Yasser, I. H.; Khoder, I. M. (2004). "Indoor air quality during renovation actions: a case study". Journal of Environmental Monitoring. 6 (9): 740–744. doi:10.1039/b402995j. PMID 15346177.
[edit]
  • US Environmental Protection Agency info on IAQ
  • Best Practices for Indoor Air Quality when Remodeling Your Home, US EPA
  • Addressing Indoor Environmental Concerns During Remodeling, US EPA
  • Renovation and Repair, Part of Indoor Air Quality Design Tools for Schools, US EPA
  • The 9 Foundations of a Healthy Building, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health

 

Photo
Photo
Photo
Photo
Photo
Photo

Driving Directions in Jefferson County


Driving Directions From Trade N Games to Royal Supply Inc
Driving Directions From Target to Royal Supply Inc
Driving Directions From Five Below to Royal Supply Inc
Driving Directions From E-Cig Mania to Royal Supply Inc
Driving Directions From Jefferson County Convention & Visitors Bureau to Royal Supply Inc
Driving Directions From Jefferson County Convention & Visitors Bureau to Royal Supply Inc
Driving Directions From Jefferson Barracks Park to Royal Supply Inc
Driving Directions From Visit Jefferson County Tennessee to Royal Supply Inc
Driving Directions From Cliff Cave County Park to Royal Supply Inc
Driving Directions From Cliff Cave County Park to Royal Supply Inc

Reviews for Royal Supply Inc


Royal Supply Inc

bill slayton

(1)

Went to get a deadbolt what they had was one I was told I'd have take it apart to lengthen and I said I wasn't buying something new and have to work on it. Thing of it is I didn't know if it was so that it could be lengthened said I didn't wanna buy something new I had to work on just to fit my door. He got all mad and slung the whole box with part across the room. A real business man. I guess the owner approves of his employees doing as such.

Royal Supply Inc

Ae Webb

(5)

Royal installed a new furnace and air conditioner just before we got our used mobile home. Recently, the furnace stopped lighting. Jared (sp?) made THREE trips to get it back to good. He was so gracious and kind. Fortunately for us it was still under warranty. BTW, those three trips were from Fenton, Missouri to Belleville, Illinois! Thanks again, Jared!

Royal Supply Inc

Gidget McCarthy

(5)

Very knowledgeable, friendly, helpful and don't make you feel like you're inconveniencing them. They seem willing to take all the time you need. As if you're the only thing they have to do that day. The store is clean, organized and not cluttered, symmetrical at that. Cuz I'm even and symmetricals biggest fan. It was a pleasure doing business with them and their prices are definitely reasonable. So, I'll be doing business with them in the future no doubt.

Royal Supply Inc

Terry Self

(1)

Horrible workmanship, horrible customer service, don't show up when they say they are. Ghosted. Was supposed to come back on Monday, no call no show. Called Tuesday and Wednesday, left messages both days. Nothing. Kinked my line, crooked to the pad and house, didn't put disconnect back on, left the trash.....

Royal Supply Inc

Toney Dunaway

(5)

This is another amazing place where we will do much more business. They are not tyrannical about the totally useless face diapers, they have a great selection of stock, they have very knowledgeable staff, very friendly staff. We got the plumbing items we really needed and will be getting more plumbing items. They also have central units, thermostats, caulking, sealants, doors, seems everything you need for a mobile home. We've found a local treasure and will be bringing much more business. Their store is clean and tidy as well!

View GBP

Frequently Asked Questions

ENERGY STAR certified HVAC systems are designed to be more energy-efficient than standard models, reducing energy consumption by up to 20%. This can lead to significant cost savings on utility bills for mobile home owners while also decreasing the environmental impact.
Mobile home owners may qualify for various financial incentives, such as rebates, tax credits, or low-interest financing options. These incentives vary by location and utility provider but can substantially offset the initial purchase and installation costs of an ENERGY STAR rated HVAC system.
Yes, besides cost savings and improved energy efficiency, ENERGY STAR certified HVAC systems often provide better temperature control, enhanced comfort levels, quieter operation, and increased system longevity due to higher quality components. These factors contribute to an overall improved living experience in a mobile home.